- From: Jeff Pollock <Jeff.Pollock@networkinference.com>
- Date: Sun, 27 Feb 2005 20:41:56 -0800
- To: <public-swbp-wg@w3.org>
- Message-ID: <D3824B3639761949B599477A08C6A0180D031F@wyoming.ad.networkinference.com>
Dear All, I am catching up on the activities of this group after a long hiatus and am thrilled with the many rich topics under discussion. Of particular interest to me were/are the threads regarding Semantic Interoperability and Ontology Driven Architectures. During the past months, and one of the reasons for my hiatus in this WG, I've had the honor of interacting with many programs (of varying maturity) that are currently engaged with OWL and RDF technology for solving an array of business problems. When possible, I like to share the knowledge I glean from the implementers of these many programs with the conferences that I have the pleasure to speak at. For Dave McComb's upcoming Semantic Technologies 2005 conference in San Francisco I am presenting on the subject of "Enterprise Semantic Web Architectures" - which is buzzword for - "How businesses can make use of OWL and RDF to accomplish valuable new capabilities: presented in terms of software architecture patterns." In the context of the aforementioned SWBP WG email threads, I think the following presentation may have some ideas to contribute, or serve to further underscore the topics already highlighted in the WG. http://www.networkinference.com/downloads/NI-Pollock-ST05.pdf I would be honored if folks in this WG found the time to check this out and offer comments in advance of the ST-05 event. Given the content of the said discussion threads I should fully expect some measured critiques as well, I hope to learn from everyone's feedback on the many important questions raised by the promise - and hype - of OWL/RDF technology within the enterprise. -Jeff- BTW: It should be noted and clarified that: * The content of this presentation has a "SOA bent" to it for three key reasons: * Industry hype for SOA at this minute * Architectural influences from the NCES community * Assuming XML/SOA underpinnings make the interfaces simpler * (and happens to jibe w/W3C vision/layer cake) * (and bypasses many 'messy' issues with other data formats) * The structure of the presentation... * [Background] =>[Use Cases] =>[Services] =>[Architectures] ...is intended to communicate in terms of UML practices * The "Logical Architecture" section is weak, and in a fuller form should embody many of the OWL design patterns discussed within this WG * I've purposefully omitted a specific discussion of FOL/FOPC/Rule interfaces with OWL systems * Because the industry landscape is too multifaceted at the moment * And many/most of the "issues" can be resolved in the old-fashioned way - programming * (with mutual understanding of the disadvantages that come with it) _____ Jeff T. Pollock Vice President, Technology Main: 760-476-0650 x114 Mobile: 760-672-8444 Fax: 760-476-0648 www.networkinference.com jeff.pollock@networkinference.com 5963 La Place Ct., Suite 300 Carlsbad, CA 92008
Attachments
- image/gif attachment: image001.gif
Received on Monday, 28 February 2005 04:44:18 UTC