- From: Uschold, Michael F <michael.f.uschold@boeing.com>
- Date: Wed, 16 Feb 2005 15:01:10 -0800
- To: <ewallace@cme.nist.gov>, <public-swbp-wg@w3.org>, <philip.tetlow@uk.ibm.com>
I agree the timetable is a bit aggressive. I won’t have had time to review the draft by then. Mike -----Original Message----- From: ewallace@cme.nist.gov [mailto:ewallace@cme.nist.gov] Sent: Tuesday, February 15, 2005 11:42 AM To: public-swbp-wg@w3.org; philip.tetlow@uk.ibm.com Subject: Re: [SE] Minutes of Telecon 15-Feb-2005 Phil: Some minor questions/concerns regarding the results of today's SWSE telecon. >o The SETF will meet informally over dinner on Tues 1st march at the >Tech Plenary in Boston - venue and possibility for telecon connectivity to >be confirmed Did anyone take an action item to ask Ralph about a speaker phone at the Tech Plen? Note also that the SE telecon time is 1300 Boston time (EST) (just after lunch). >o The SETF agrees to proceed with the review its current Editors Draft >on â€?Ontology Driven Architectures and Potential Uses of the Semantic Web in >Software Engineering’ for publication as a note by 17:00 (UTC) 23 Feb 2005. >This is based on the timetable of comments returned to Phil Tetlow by: > o Task force members before 17:00 (UCT) 18th Feb 2005 > o Working group members before 13:00 23 Feb 2005 following >inclusion of comments from task force members I think the publication schedule is too aggressive. At the very least, you should move the deadlines to COB for some time zone in the US (2200 UTC perhaps). It would also be quite appropriate to shoot for WG approval at the face-to-face. -Evan
Received on Wednesday, 16 February 2005 23:01:43 UTC