- From: Jeff Pan <pan@cs.man.ac.uk>
- Date: Thu, 17 Feb 2005 09:18:16 -0000
- To: "Dan Connolly" <connolly@w3.org>, <public-swbp-wg@w3.org>
> I was just reading over some historical OWL stuff, and > I was reminded of the awkward fit between some 3-ary > and 4-ary constructs in OWL, given RDF's binary limitations. Those are meta-relations instead of relations among individuals. Greetings, Jeff -- Dr. Jeff Z. Pan ( http://DL-Web.man.ac.uk/ ) School of Computer Science, The University of Manchester > I don't see discussion of constructs like onProperty/hasValue > in > > Defining N-ary Relations on the Semantic Web: Use With Individuals > http://www.w3.org/TR/2004/WD-swbp-n-aryRelations-20040721/ > > I think OWL follows "pattern 2"... a Restriction > works sorta like a Purchase in the example. > > It seems worth pointing this out in the document. > > > -- > Dan Connolly, W3C http://www.w3.org/People/Connolly/ > D3C2 887B 0F92 6005 C541 0875 0F91 96DE 6E52 C29E > > >
Received on Thursday, 17 February 2005 09:18:51 UTC