Re: comment: discussion of OWL n-ary constructs?

On Thu, 2005-02-17 at 09:18 +0000, Jeff Pan wrote:
> > I was just reading over some historical OWL stuff, and
> > I was reminded of the awkward fit between some 3-ary
> > and 4-ary constructs in OWL, given RDF's binary limitations.
> Those are meta-relations instead of relations among individuals.

Hm... I'm not sure what a meta-relation is, but please explain
it in the n-aryRelations draft in any case.

> > Defining N-ary Relations on the Semantic Web: Use With Individuals
> >

Dan Connolly, W3C
D3C2 887B 0F92 6005 C541  0875 0F91 96DE 6E52 C29E

Received on Thursday, 17 February 2005 13:24:30 UTC