- From: Dan Brickley <danbri@w3.org>
- Date: Wed, 23 Feb 2005 14:54:41 -0500
- To: Guus Schreiber <schreiber@cs.vu.nl>
- Cc: SWBPD list <public-swbp-wg@w3.org>
* Guus Schreiber <schreiber@cs.vu.nl> [2005-02-23 20:33+0100] > > 1. ADMIN (15 min) > > Roll call > Regrets: Carroll, Nguyen also DanBri; I'm flying to Boston. > 3.1 PORT (Alistair) > > ACTION: Al to run pubrules checker on SKOS Core Guide ; Ralph will help. > ACTION: Ralph to link SKOS Core Guide from home page more prominently. > > - review of Quick Guide and Vocab Soec document I can't make it, but do please consider question of putting Guide and Core specs out at same time. [[ [ralph] > I have become more than a little concerned with the references from > the Guide to the Spec as I've been doing due-diligence on the request > to publish the Guide as a Working Draft. I think that any reasonable > reviewer of the Guide will want to follow the references to the Spec. > If the Spec is not ready to be published for whatever reason then > I no longer think the WG should be requesting to publish the Guide > independently. [me] I'm convinced now. As much by the positive case as re concerns. By having the two go out at the same time, we'll be in a position to get slashdotted etc. and not look half-ready. ]]-- http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-swbp-wg/2005Feb/0104.html Also I propose to the TF some things we might agree, re our decision on targetting Note vs suspicion we might have REC-worthy material: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-swbp-wg/2005Feb/0099.html My SKOS core review is : http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-esw-thes/2005Feb/0054.html Specifically it asks for Ralph's review of the namespace policy stuff (since it makes claims about a w3c hosted namesace) and proposes some text. Hope this helps. Basically I think SKOS Core is pretty close... Sorry I will miss the telecon. See some of you soon, Dan
Received on Wednesday, 23 February 2005 19:54:42 UTC