public-sml@w3.org from November 2007 by author

bugzilla@wiggum.w3.org

• [Bug 4992] Object identity needs to be clarified (Friday, 30 November)
• [Bug 5298] Consider using another term for 'URI scheme' (Friday, 30 November)
• [Bug 5178] interop criteria when SML compliant documents using different schema versions are exchanged (Friday, 30 November)
• [Bug 4687] Handling of DTDs when composing an IF document (Friday, 30 November)
• [Bug 4793] Restructure section 3.4 to follow the following 1) mapping from syntax to cannonical representation, 2) what constitutues a valid usage and 3) implications on instances. (Thursday, 29 November)
• [Bug 4639] Allow cycle checking on element graphs as well as document graphs (Thursday, 29 November)
• [Bug 5181] xml:base intended to replace smlif:baseURI only (Thursday, 29 November)
• [Bug 4639] Allow cycle checking on element graphs as well as document graphs (Thursday, 29 November)
• [Bug 4772] add keyword substitution in smlerr localized messages? (Thursday, 29 November)
• [Bug 4687] Handling of DTDs when composing an IF document (Thursday, 29 November)
• [Bug 4995] Scoping of sml identity constraints (key, keyref, unique) (Thursday, 29 November)
• [Bug 5024] sml:keyref example (Thursday, 29 November)
• [Bug 4774] definitional schema documents should be preferentially used over all other sources when validating instances (Thursday, 29 November)
• [Bug 4770] Decide which schema elements should be changed to global (Thursday, 29 November)
• [Bug 5178] interop criteria when SML compliant documents using different schema versions are exchanged (Thursday, 29 November)
• [Bug 5272] Can a data element contain more than one document ? (Thursday, 29 November)
• [Bug 5133] xpath restrictions should be removed (Thursday, 29 November)
• [Bug 4657] Restrict the use of deref in sml:field/@xpath for SML implementation built on top of relational databases (Thursday, 29 November)
• [Bug 4656] support for references pointing to elements other than root elements should be (Thursday, 29 November)
• [Bug 5283] "interchange set" or "interchange model" (Thursday, 29 November)
• [Bug 5108] sml 4.3.1 sml:acyclic (Thursday, 29 November)
• [Bug 4793] Restructure section 3.4 to follow the following 1) mapping from syntax to cannonical representation, 2) what constitutues a valid usage and 3) implications on instances. (Thursday, 29 November)
• [Bug 4992] Object identity needs to be clarified (Thursday, 29 November)
• [Bug 5181] xml:base intended to replace smlif:baseURI only (Thursday, 29 November)
• [Bug 4774] definitional schema documents should be preferentially used over all other sources when validating instances (Thursday, 29 November)
• [Bug 4770] Decide which schema elements should be changed to global (Thursday, 29 November)
• [Bug 4687] Handling of DTDs when composing an IF document (Thursday, 29 November)
• [Bug 4639] Allow cycle checking on element graphs as well as document graphs (Thursday, 29 November)
• [Bug 5181] xml:base intended to replace smlif:baseURI only (Thursday, 29 November)
• [Bug 4637] What should we do with EPR scheme? (Thursday, 29 November)
• [Bug 4639] Allow cycle checking on element graphs as well as document graphs (Thursday, 29 November)
• [Bug 4770] Decide which schema elements should be changed to global (Thursday, 29 November)
• [Bug 4636] What should SML 3.3.1.1 say about fragment identifiers? (Thursday, 29 November)
• [Bug 5242] define how the EPR scheme is resolved (Thursday, 29 November)
• [Bug 4637] What should we do with EPR scheme? (Thursday, 29 November)
• [Bug 4687] Handling of DTDs when composing an IF document (Thursday, 29 November)
• [Bug 4639] Allow cycle checking on element graphs as well as document graphs (Thursday, 29 November)
• [Bug 4687] Handling of DTDs when composing an IF document (Thursday, 29 November)
• [Bug 5283] "interchange set" or "interchange model" (Wednesday, 28 November)
• [Bug 4637] What should we do with EPR scheme? (Wednesday, 28 November)
• [Bug 4637] What should we do with EPR scheme? (Wednesday, 28 November)
• [Bug 4687] Handling of DTDs when composing an IF document (Wednesday, 28 November)
• [Bug 5294] Add an explanation on why the smlif:dataType has processContents=skip (Wednesday, 28 November)
• [Bug 5291] Add 'Consistent Reference Schemes' section under 4.2 Reference Semantics (Wednesday, 28 November)
• [Bug 5291] Add 'Consistent Reference Schemes' section under 4.2 Reference Semantics (Wednesday, 28 November)
• [Bug 4687] Handling of DTDs when composing an IF document (Wednesday, 28 November)
• [Bug 5242] define how the EPR scheme is resolved (Wednesday, 28 November)
• [Bug 4637] What should we do with EPR scheme? (Wednesday, 28 November)
• [Bug 5133] xpath restrictions should be removed (Wednesday, 28 November)
• [Bug 4772] add keyword substitution in smlerr localized messages? (Wednesday, 28 November)
• [Bug 4770] Decide which schema elements should be changed to global (Wednesday, 28 November)
• [Bug 4687] Handling of DTDs when composing an IF document (Wednesday, 28 November)
• [Bug 5291] Add 'Consistent Reference Schemes' section under 4.2 Reference Semantics (Wednesday, 28 November)
• [Bug 4656] support for references pointing to elements other than root elements should be (Wednesday, 28 November)
• [Bug 4675] add text in section 5.3.3 to require that consumers and producers are required to implement at a minimum the uri scheme (Wednesday, 28 November)
• [Bug 4656] support for references pointing to elements other than root elements should be (Tuesday, 27 November)
• [Bug 5291] Add 'Consistent Reference Schemes' section under 4.2 Reference Semantics (Tuesday, 27 November)
• [Bug 4637] What should we do with EPR scheme? (Tuesday, 27 November)
• [Bug 5291] Add 'Consistent Reference Schemes' section under 4.2 Reference Semantics (Tuesday, 27 November)
• [Bug 5291] Add 'Consistent Reference Schemes' section under 4.2 Reference Semantics (Tuesday, 27 November)
• [Bug 4639] Allow cycle checking on element graphs as well as document graphs (Tuesday, 27 November)
• [Bug 4656] support for references pointing to elements other than root elements should be (Monday, 26 November)
• [Bug 4656] support for references pointing to elements other than root elements should be (Monday, 26 November)
• [Bug 4636] What should SML 3.3.1.1 say about fragment identifiers? (Monday, 26 November)
• [Bug 4770] Decide which schema elements should be changed to global (Monday, 26 November)
• [Bug 4770] Decide which schema elements should be changed to global (Monday, 26 November)
• [Bug 4636] What should SML 3.3.1.1 say about fragment identifiers? (Monday, 26 November)
• [Bug 5247] <data> without a sub-element (Monday, 26 November)
• [Bug 5283] "interchange set" or "interchange model" (Sunday, 25 November)
• [Bug 5113] smlif minor editorial comments (Thursday, 22 November)
• [Bug 5272] Can a data element contain more than one document ? (Thursday, 22 November)
• [Bug 5113] smlif minor editorial comments (Thursday, 22 November)
• [Bug 5247] <data> without a sub-element (Thursday, 22 November)
• [Bug 5098] sml section 4 Schemas text should be moved into Intro (Wednesday, 21 November)
• [Bug 5247] <data> without a sub-element (Wednesday, 21 November)
• [Bug 5272] Can a data element contain more than one document ? (Wednesday, 21 November)
• [Bug 5110] sml 4.3.2.1 sml:targetElement - 4.3.2.3 sml:targetType (Wednesday, 21 November)
• [Bug 5106] sml 4.2.2 epr scheme (Wednesday, 21 November)
• [Bug 5106] sml 4.2.2 epr scheme (Wednesday, 21 November)
• [Bug 5242] define how the EPR scheme is resolved (Wednesday, 21 November)
• [Bug 4637] What should we do with EPR scheme? (Wednesday, 21 November)
• [Bug 5277] Update usage of IF 'inter-document references' in the SML spec (Wednesday, 21 November)
• [Bug 5277] Update usage of to IF 'inter-document references' in the SML spec (Wednesday, 21 November)
• [Bug 5119] consolidate defs of uri and epr schemes in sml spec (Tuesday, 20 November)
• [Bug 5178] interop criteria when SML compliant documents using different schema versions are exchanged (Tuesday, 20 November)
• [Bug 5106] sml 4.2.2 epr scheme (Tuesday, 20 November)
• [Bug 5201] Documents without aliases cannot be referenced? (Tuesday, 20 November)
• [Bug 5120] smlif 3.4.2 Definition of inter-document references (Tuesday, 20 November)
• [Bug 4777] Remove requirement that anyURI and its derivations be treated as inter-document refs (Tuesday, 20 November)
• [Bug 4978] Is smlerr:output necessary? (Monday, 19 November)
• [Bug 4746] clarify SMLIF section 2 signature requirements (Monday, 19 November)
• [Bug 5099] sml section 4.1 References most text should be moved into other sections (Monday, 19 November)
• [Bug 4776] conflicts between schema and text - declare which wins (Monday, 19 November)
• [Bug 5272] Can a data element contain more than one document ? (Monday, 19 November)
• [Bug 4992] Object identity needs to be clarified (Monday, 19 November)
• [Bug 4746] clarify SMLIF section 2 signature requirements (Monday, 19 November)
• [Bug 5201] Documents without aliases cannot be referenced? (Monday, 19 November)
• [Bug 5181] xml:base intended to replace smlif:baseURI only (Monday, 19 November)
• [Bug 5171] Confusing and contradicting sections on resolving inter-document references (Monday, 19 November)
• [Bug 5120] smlif 3.4.2 Definition of inter-document references (Monday, 19 November)
• [Bug 4777] Remove requirement that anyURI and its derivations be treated as inter-document refs (Monday, 19 November)
• [Bug 4978] Is smlerr:output necessary? (Monday, 19 November)
• [Bug 5178] interop criteria when SML compliant documents using different schema versions are exchanged (Monday, 19 November)
• [Bug 5241] define how the SML URI scheme is resolved (Sunday, 18 November)
• [Bug 4755] SMLIF section 3.3.6 some fragment URI cases not covered (Sunday, 18 November)
• [Bug 4992] Object identity needs to be clarified (Sunday, 18 November)
• [Bug 5272] Can a data element contain more than one document ? (Friday, 16 November)
• [Bug 5272] Can a data element contain more than one document ? (Friday, 16 November)
• [Bug 5272] Can a data element contain more than one document ? (Friday, 16 November)
• [Bug 4894] Clarify that acyclicity is determined polymorphically (Thursday, 15 November)
• [Bug 4978] Is smlerr:output necessary? (Thursday, 15 November)
• [Bug 4978] Is smlerr:output necessary? (Thursday, 15 November)
• [Bug 4675] add text in section 5.3.3 to require that consumers and producers are required to implement at a minimum the uri scheme (Thursday, 15 November)
• [Bug 5095] inter-document references defined inconsistently (Thursday, 15 November)
• [Bug 4788] Change all usages of URI to URI-reference which includes both absolute and relative forms of URIs. (Thursday, 15 November)
• [Bug 4788] Change all usages of URI to URI-reference which includes both absolute and relative forms of URIs. (Thursday, 15 November)
• [Bug 5247] <data> without a sub-element (Thursday, 15 November)
• [Bug 4994] Portable interpretation of "locator" (Thursday, 15 November)
• [Bug 5241] define how the SML URI scheme is resolved (Thursday, 15 November)
• [Bug 4894] Clarify that acyclicity is determined polymorphically (Thursday, 15 November)
• [Bug 4978] Is smlerr:output necessary? (Thursday, 15 November)
• [Bug 4755] SMLIF section 3.3.6 some fragment URI cases not covered (Thursday, 15 November)
• [Bug 4772] add keyword substitution in smlerr localized messages? (Thursday, 15 November)
• [Bug 4978] Is smlerr:output necessary? (Thursday, 15 November)
• [Bug 5099] sml section 4.1 References most text should be moved into other sections (Thursday, 15 November)
• [Bug 5112] rule binding concept should move to sml (Thursday, 15 November)
• [Bug 5248] What does it mean if <locator> is not resolved (Thursday, 15 November)
• [Bug 4992] Object identity needs to be clarified (Thursday, 15 November)
• [Bug 4994] Portable interpretation of "locator" (Thursday, 15 November)
• [Bug 5112] rule binding concept should move to sml (Thursday, 15 November)
• [Bug 5248] What does it mean if <locator> is not resolved (Thursday, 15 November)
• [Bug 4992] Object identity needs to be clarified (Thursday, 15 November)
• [Bug 4994] Portable interpretation of "locator" (Thursday, 15 November)
• [Bug 5241] define how the SML URI scheme is resolved (Thursday, 15 November)
• [Bug 4894] Clarify that acyclicity is determined polymorphically (Thursday, 15 November)
• [Bug 4755] SMLIF section 3.3.6 some fragment URI cases not covered (Thursday, 15 November)
• [Bug 4788] Change all usages of URI to URI-reference which includes both absolute and relative forms of URIs. (Thursday, 15 November)
• [Bug 4788] Change all usages of URI to URI-reference which includes both absolute and relative forms of URIs. (Thursday, 15 November)
• [Bug 4788] Change all usages of URI to URI-reference which includes both absolute and relative forms of URIs. (Thursday, 15 November)
• [Bug 4788] Change all usages of URI to URI-reference which includes both absolute and relative forms of URIs. (Thursday, 15 November)
• [Bug 5069] Use of "reference" for reference elements vs. schemes (Wednesday, 14 November)
• [Bug 5069] Use of "reference" for reference elements vs. schemes (Wednesday, 14 November)
• [Bug 5239] Correct definition of ref attribute of sml:key/sml:unique (Wednesday, 14 November)
• [Bug 5215] SML-IF spec must make normative reference to xml schema and schematron versions that must be supported (Wednesday, 14 November)
• [Bug 5112] rule binding concept should move to sml (Wednesday, 14 November)
• [Bug 5069] Use of "reference" for reference elements vs. schemes (Wednesday, 14 November)
• [Bug 4819] Append to 3.3.2 \"Consumers MUST NOT interpret wsa:address \" the phrase \"or any other schemes other than uri\" (Wednesday, 14 November)
• [Bug 4637] What should we do with EPR scheme? (Wednesday, 14 November)
• [Bug 5239] Correct definition of ref attribute of sml:key/sml:unique (Wednesday, 14 November)
• [Bug 5112] rule binding concept should move to sml (Wednesday, 14 November)
• [Bug 5099] sml section 4.1 References most text should be moved into other sections (Wednesday, 14 November)
• [Bug 4819] Append to 3.3.2 \"Consumers MUST NOT interpret wsa:address \" the phrase \"or any other schemes other than uri\" (Wednesday, 14 November)
• [Bug 4788] Change all usages of URI to URI-reference which includes both absolute and relative forms of URIs. (Wednesday, 14 November)
• [Bug 5248] What does it mean if <locator> is not resolved (Wednesday, 14 November)
• [Bug 4994] Portable interpretation of "locator" (Wednesday, 14 November)
• [Bug 4992] Object identity needs to be clarified (Wednesday, 14 November)
• [Bug 4894] Clarify that acyclicity is determined polymorphically (Wednesday, 14 November)
• [Bug 4638] Conformance section needed (Wednesday, 14 November)
• [Bug 4639] Allow cycle checking on element graphs as well as document graphs (Wednesday, 14 November)
• [Bug 4788] Change all usages of URI to URI-reference which includes both absolute and relative forms of URIs. (Wednesday, 14 November)
• [Bug 4755] SMLIF section 3.3.6 some fragment URI cases not covered (Tuesday, 13 November)
• [Bug 5040] Hanlding of reference constraints on different kinds of elements (Tuesday, 13 November)
• [Bug 5241] define how the SML URI scheme is resolved (Tuesday, 13 November)
• [Bug 5181] xml:base intended to replace smlif:baseURI only (Tuesday, 13 November)
• [Bug 5248] What does it mean if <locator> is not resolved (Tuesday, 13 November)
• [Bug 4811] Clarify section 6.1 regarding Schematron phases (Monday, 12 November)
• [Bug 5248] What does it mean if <locator> is not resolved (Monday, 12 November)
• [Bug 4811] Clarify section 6.1 regarding Schematron phases (Monday, 12 November)
• [Bug 5040] Hanlding of reference constraints on different kinds of elements (Monday, 12 November)
• [Bug 4994] Portable interpretation of "locator" (Monday, 12 November)
• [Bug 4978] Is smlerr:output necessary? (Monday, 12 November)
• [Bug 5119] consolidate defs of uri and epr schemes in sml spec (Monday, 12 November)
• [Bug 5215] SML-IF spec must make normative reference to xml schema and schematron versions that must be supported (Monday, 12 November)
• [Bug 5106] sml 4.2.2 epr scheme (Monday, 12 November)
• [Bug 5215] SML-IF spec must make normative reference to xml schema and schematron versions that must be supported (Monday, 12 November)
• [Bug 5106] sml 4.2.2 epr scheme (Monday, 12 November)
• [Bug 5106] sml 4.2.2 epr scheme (Monday, 12 November)
• [Bug 4894] Clarify that acyclicity is determined polymorphically (Monday, 12 November)
• [Bug 5248] What does it mean if <locator> is not resolved (Monday, 12 November)
• [Bug 5106] sml 4.2.2 epr scheme (Monday, 12 November)
• [Bug 5247] <data> without a sub-element (Monday, 12 November)
• [Bug 4675] add text in section 5.3.3 to require that consumers and producers are required to implement at a minimum the uri scheme (Monday, 12 November)
• [Bug 5069] Use of "reference" for reference elements vs. schemes (Monday, 12 November)
• [Bug 5099] sml section 4.1 References most text should be moved into other sections (Monday, 12 November)
• [Bug 5106] sml 4.2.2 epr scheme (Monday, 12 November)
• [Bug 5112] rule binding concept should move to sml (Monday, 12 November)
• [Bug 5239] Correct definition of ref attribute of sml:key/sml:unique (Monday, 12 November)
• [Bug 5040] Hanlding of reference constraints on different kinds of elements (Monday, 12 November)
• [Bug 4811] Clarify section 6.1 regarding Schematron phases (Saturday, 10 November)
• [Bug 5248] What does it mean if <locator> is not resolved (Saturday, 10 November)
• [Bug 5215] SML-IF spec must make normative reference to xml schema and schematron versions that must be supported (Saturday, 10 November)
• [Bug 5064] On which component(s) are SML reference constraints specified? (Saturday, 10 November)
• [Bug 5040] Hanlding of reference constraints on different kinds of elements (Friday, 9 November)
• [Bug 5040] Hanlding of reference constraints on different kinds of elements (Friday, 9 November)
• [Bug 5040] Hanlding of reference constraints on different kinds of elements (Friday, 9 November)
• [Bug 5040] Hanlding of reference constraints on different kinds of elements (Friday, 9 November)
• [Bug 5040] Hanlding of reference constraints on different kinds of elements (Friday, 9 November)
• [Bug 4811] Clarify section 6.1 regarding Schematron phases (Friday, 9 November)
• [Bug 5040] Hanlding of reference constraints on different kinds of elements (Friday, 9 November)
• [Bug 4811] Clarify section 6.1 regarding Schematron phases (Friday, 9 November)
• [Bug 5259] Rename 'Sample Model (Non-Normative)' section to 'Model Definition Document Sample (Non-Normative)' (Thursday, 8 November)
• [Bug 5259] Rename 'Sample Model (Non-Normative)' section to 'Model Definition Document Sample (Non-Normative)' (Thursday, 8 November)
• [Bug 5063] Inheritance of some SML reference constraints (Thursday, 8 November)
• [Bug 5201] Documents without aliases cannot be referenced? (Thursday, 8 November)
• [Bug 5171] Confusing and contradicting sections on resolving inter-document references (Thursday, 8 November)
• [Bug 5120] smlif 3.4.2 Definition of inter-document references (Thursday, 8 November)
• [Bug 5119] consolidate defs of uri and epr schemes in sml spec (Thursday, 8 November)
• [Bug 5063] Inheritance of some SML reference constraints (Thursday, 8 November)
• [Bug 5040] Hanlding of reference constraints on different kinds of elements (Thursday, 8 November)
• [Bug 5047] Content of "dataType" in the IF schema (Thursday, 8 November)
• [Bug 4992] Object identity needs to be clarified (Thursday, 8 November)
• [Bug 5040] Hanlding of reference constraints on different kinds of elements (Thursday, 8 November)
• [Bug 5040] Hanlding of reference constraints on different kinds of elements (Thursday, 8 November)
• [Bug 4636] What should SML 3.3.1.1 say about fragment identifiers? (Thursday, 8 November)
• [Bug 5040] Hanlding of reference constraints on different kinds of elements (Thursday, 8 November)
• [Bug 4992] Object identity needs to be clarified (Wednesday, 7 November)
• [Bug 4995] Scoping of sml identity constraints (key, keyref, unique) (Wednesday, 7 November)
• [Bug 4746] clarify SMLIF section 2 signature requirements (Wednesday, 7 November)
• [Bug 5099] sml section 4.1 References most text should be moved into other sections (Wednesday, 7 November)
• [Bug 5070] Requirement for validator to implement deref() (Tuesday, 6 November)
• [Bug 5070] Requirement for validator to implement deref() (Tuesday, 6 November)
• [Bug 5070] Requirement for validator to implement deref() (Tuesday, 6 November)
• [Bug 5047] Content of "dataType" in the IF schema (Tuesday, 6 November)
• [Bug 5108] sml 4.3.1 sml:acyclic (Tuesday, 6 November)
• [Bug 4992] Object identity needs to be clarified (Tuesday, 6 November)
• [Bug 5181] xml:base intended to replace smlif:baseURI only (Monday, 5 November)
• [Bug 5120] smlif 3.4.2 Definition of inter-document references (Monday, 5 November)
• [Bug 5063] Inheritance of some SML reference constraints (Monday, 5 November)
• [Bug 5248] What does it mean if <locator> is not resolved (Monday, 5 November)
• [Bug 5247] <data> without a sub-element (Monday, 5 November)
• [Bug 5245] IF : Replace [Schematron] with [ISO/IEC 19757-3] in non-normative reference (Monday, 5 November)
• [Bug 5245] IF : Replace [Schematron] with [ISO/IEC 19757-3] in non-normative reference (Monday, 5 November)
• [Bug 4639] Allow cycle checking on element graphs as well as document graphs (Sunday, 4 November)
• [Bug 4639] Allow cycle checking on element graphs as well as document graphs (Sunday, 4 November)
• [Bug 4894] Clarify that acyclicity is determined polymorphically (Sunday, 4 November)
• [Bug 5070] Requirement for validator to implement deref() (Saturday, 3 November)
• [Bug 5070] Requirement for validator to implement deref() (Saturday, 3 November)
• [Bug 5243] SML - Rename Informative Reference Section to Non-Normative Reference (Friday, 2 November)
• [Bug 5243] SML - Rename Informative Reference Section to Non-Normative Reference (Friday, 2 November)
• [Bug 4675] add text in section 5.3.3 to require that consumers and producers are required to implement at a minimum the uri scheme (Friday, 2 November)
• [Bug 4675] add text in section 5.3.3 to require that consumers and producers are required to implement at a minimum the uri scheme (Friday, 2 November)
• [Bug 5121] smlif 3.4.3 SML reference schemes that are not SML-IF inter-document references (Friday, 2 November)
• [Bug 5107] sml 4.3 Constraints on References - delete redundant text (Friday, 2 November)
• [Bug 5102] sml uri and epr schemes - refer to them consistently (Friday, 2 November)
• [Bug 5025] selectorXPathType & fieldXPathType pattern facets (Friday, 2 November)
• [Bug 4865] clearly doc requirements for defining a reference scheme (Friday, 2 November)
• [Bug 5242] define how the EPR scheme is resolved (Friday, 2 November)
• [Bug 5241] define how the SML URI scheme is resolved (Friday, 2 November)
• [Bug 5069] Use of "reference" for reference elements vs. schemes (Friday, 2 November)
• [Bug 5108] sml 4.3.1 sml:acyclic (Thursday, 1 November)
• [Bug 4811] Clarify section 6.1 regarding Schematron phases (Thursday, 1 November)
• [Bug 4811] Clarify section 6.1 regarding Schematron phases (Thursday, 1 November)
• [Bug 4978] Is smlerr:output necessary? (Thursday, 1 November)
• [Bug 4770] Decide which schema elements should be changed to global (Thursday, 1 November)
• [Bug 4687] Handling of DTDs when composing an IF document (Thursday, 1 November)
• [Bug 5107] sml 4.3 Constraints on References - delete redundant text (Thursday, 1 November)
• [Bug 4639] Allow cycle checking on element graphs as well as document graphs (Thursday, 1 November)
• [Bug 5047] Content of "dataType" in the IF schema (Thursday, 1 November)
• [Bug 5095] inter-document references defined inconsistently (Thursday, 1 November)
• [Bug 5117] unresolved references defined inconsistently (Thursday, 1 November)

John Arwe

• [w3c sml][agenda] 2007-11-29 SML Teleconference (Wednesday, 28 November)
• June 2008 meeting dates (Tuesday, 27 November)
• [w3c sml][agenda] 2007-11-15 SML Teleconference (Wednesday, 14 November)
• RE: [Bug 5047] Content of "dataType" in the IF schema (Monday, 12 November)
• [w3c sml][minutes] 2007-10-15 SML (Thursday, 1 November)

Jordan Boucher

• [w3c sml][minutes] 2007-11-26 SML Teleconference (Wednesday, 28 November)

Kumar Pandit

• RE: any experience with abusing w3c sites ?.. (Wednesday, 28 November)
• RE: [Bug 4746] clarify SMLIF section 2 signature requirements (Sunday, 18 November)
• RE: SMLIF inter-document reference proposal (Friday, 16 November)
• RE: [w3c sml][agenda] 2007-11-15 SML Teleconference (Wednesday, 14 November)
• FW: [Bug 5241] define how the SML URI scheme is resolved (Tuesday, 13 November)
• RE: can't access editor's copies (Tuesday, 13 November)
• RE: [Bug 5040] Hanlding of reference constraints on different kinds of elements (Friday, 9 November)
• RE: [Bug 5040] Hanlding of reference constraints on different kinds of elements (Friday, 9 November)
• RE: [Bug 4811] Clarify section 6.1 regarding Schematron phases (Tuesday, 6 November)
• RE: [Bug 5070] Requirement for validator to implement deref() (Monday, 5 November)
• RE: [Bug 5070] Requirement for validator to implement deref() (Saturday, 3 November)
• RE: [Bug 4675] add text in section 5.3.3 to require that consumers and producers are required to implement at a minimum the uri scheme (Friday, 2 November)
• [Bug 5047] Content of "dataType" in the IF schema (Friday, 2 November)
• RE: [Bug 4811] Clarify section 6.1 regarding Schematron phases (Thursday, 1 November)
• RE: [Bug 4639] Allow cycle checking on element graphs as well as document graphs (Thursday, 1 November)

Lynn, James (HP Software)

• [w3c sml][minutes] Minutes for 2007-11-15 SML Telecon (Friday, 16 November)
• RE: [Bug 4639] Allow cycle checking on element graphs as well as document graphs (Monday, 5 November)
• RE: RE: [Bug 4639] Allow cycle checking on element graphs as well as document graphs (Thursday, 1 November)

Pratul Dublish

• RE: [w3c sml][agenda] 2007-11-26bv SML (Monday, 26 November)
• [w3c sml][agenda] 2007-11-26bv SML (Monday, 26 November)
• New XPointer scheme for SML (Friday, 23 November)
• [w3c sml][agenda] 2007-11-19 SML (Friday, 16 November)
• RE: [Bug 5248] What does it mean if <locator> is not resolved (Wednesday, 14 November)
• RE: Please review bugs marked as needsReview (Wednesday, 14 November)
• Please review bugs marked as needsReview (Monday, 12 November)
• [w3c sml][agenda] 2007-11-12 SML (Monday, 12 November)
• [w3c sml][agenda] 2007-11-08 SML (Thursday, 8 November)
• RE: [Bug 4811] Clarify section 6.1 regarding Schematron phases (Tuesday, 6 November)
• RE: [Bug 5070] Requirement for validator to implement deref() (Tuesday, 6 November)
• RE: [Bug 5047] Content of "dataType" in the IF schema (Tuesday, 6 November)
• [w3c sml][agenda] 2007-11-01 SML (Thursday, 1 November)

Sandy Gao

• [w3c sml][minutes] 2007-11-29 SML Teleconference (Friday, 30 November)
• Re: [Bug 4793] Restructure section 3.4 ... (Thursday, 29 November)
• [w3c sml] Revised proposal for 4774 schema binding (Thursday, 29 November)
• Re: Section 4.2.2 SML EPR Reference Scheme (Wednesday, 28 November)
• RE: SMLIF inter-document reference proposal (Monday, 19 November)
• SMLIF inter-document reference proposal (Thursday, 15 November)
• Fw: [Bug 4746] clarify SMLIF section 2 signature requirements (Wednesday, 7 November)
• RE: [Bug 4811] Clarify section 6.1 regarding Schematron phases (Tuesday, 6 November)
• Re: [Bug 4639] Allow cycle checking on element graphs as well as document graphs (Monday, 5 November)
• Re: [Bug 5047] Content of "dataType" in the IF schema (Monday, 5 November)
• [w3c sml] About Conforming Processor (was [Bug 4675] ...) (Monday, 5 November)
• RE: [Bug 4811] Clarify section 6.1 regarding Schematron phases (Monday, 5 November)
• RE: [Bug 5070] Requirement for validator to implement deref() (Monday, 5 November)
• RE: [w3c sml] Minutes for 2007-11-01 SML Telecon (Friday, 2 November)
• [w3c sml] Minutes for 2007-11-01 SML Telecon (Friday, 2 November)

Smith, Virginia (HP Software)

• RE: SMLIF inter-document reference proposal (Friday, 16 November)
• RE: can't access editor's copies (Monday, 12 November)
• RE: [Bug 5040] Hanlding of reference constraints on different kinds of elements (Friday, 9 November)
• RE: [Bug 5040] Hanlding of reference constraints on different kinds of elements (Friday, 9 November)
• [w3c wml] Final review requested - Bug 4811 (Friday, 9 November)
• [w3c sml] [minutes] 2007-11-08 SML Teleconference (Friday, 9 November)
• RE: [Bug 4639] Allow cycle checking on element graphs as well as document graphs (Monday, 5 November)
• [w3c sml] Bug 4639 - cycle proposal recommendation (Sunday, 4 November)
• RE: [Bug 5070] Requirement for validator to implement deref() (Saturday, 3 November)
• FW: [Bug 4675] add text in section 5.3.3 to require that consumers and producers are required to implement at a minimum the uri scheme (Friday, 2 November)
• RE: [w3c sml] Minutes for 2007-11-01 SML Telecon (Friday, 2 November)
• RE: [w3c sml][agenda] 2007-11-01 SML (Thursday, 1 November)
• RE: [Bug 4639] Allow cycle checking on element graphs as well as document graphs (Thursday, 1 November)

Valentina Popescu

• any experience with abusing w3c sites ?.. (Tuesday, 27 November)
• meeting minutes for Nov 19 - updated version (Monday, 26 November)
• meeting minutes , 11/19/07 (Monday, 19 November)
• ACTION 133 - uncover usecases for the xml output format on schematron rules (Thursday, 15 November)
• ACTION 143 - Create proposal on bugzilla 4772 - add keyword substitution in smlerr localized messages? (Thursday, 15 November)
• Re: [w3c sml][agenda] 2007-11-15 SML Teleconference (Wednesday, 14 November)
• RE: can't access editor's copies (Tuesday, 13 November)
• can't access editor's copies (Monday, 12 November)
• regrets for the 11/08 teleconference (Wednesday, 7 November)

Waschke, Marvin G

• Regrets 2007-11-15 SML (Thursday, 15 November)
• Regrets 2007-11-01 SML (Thursday, 1 November)

Wilson, Kirk D

• RE: [Bug 4992] Object identity needs to be clarified (Thursday, 29 November)
• [w3c sml] [issue 4637] EPR Scheme (Thursday, 29 November)
• RE: [w3c sml][agenda] 2007-11-26bv SML (Monday, 26 November)
• [w3csml] [minutes] 2007-11-12 SML (Saturday, 24 November)
• Section 4.2.2 SML EPR Reference Scheme (Wednesday, 21 November)
• RE: [Bug 5106] sml 4.2.2 epr scheme (Tuesday, 20 November)
• FW: SMLIF inter-document reference proposal (Friday, 16 November)
• [w3c sml] XML 1.0 erratum (Thursday, 15 November)
• [w3C sml] [4637: EPR Scheme] Beginnings of a proposal on the EPR Scheme (Wednesday, 14 November)
• RE: [Bug 5241] define how the SML URI scheme is resolved (Tuesday, 13 November)
• RE: [w3c sml][agenda] 2007-11-12 SML (Monday, 12 November)
• RE: [Bug 4995] Scoping of sml identity constraints (key, keyref, unique) (Wednesday, 7 November)
• RE: [w3c sml] Minutes for 2007-11-01 SML Telecon (Friday, 2 November)
• RE: [w3c sml][agenda] 2007-11-01 SML (Thursday, 1 November)

Last message date: Friday, 30 November 2007 23:51:03 UTC