- From: <bugzilla@wiggum.w3.org>
- Date: Mon, 12 Nov 2007 20:03:09 +0000
- To: public-sml@w3.org
- CC:
http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=5106 ------- Comment #7 from kirk.wilson@ca.com 2007-11-12 20:03 ------- The normative statements in comment #5 seem to be inconsistent with the proposal made in 5119, which is proposed for SML-IF: (5) to the paragraph starting "In contrast, the wsa:address..." append "A sufficiently constraining reference scheme definition, e.g. one that determined the protocol binding used to interact with the endpoint, MAY assert that instances of the reference scheme are inter-document references." The case where it is possible for an EPR to be inter-document reference occurs when the protocol binding is sufficient constrained by the reference scheme defintion. I don't believe we discussed how that is to be done, so I suspect it is difficult at this point to say anything about the normative status of the EPR reference being an inter-document reference.
Received on Monday, 12 November 2007 20:03:18 UTC