- From: <bugzilla@wiggum.w3.org>
- Date: Thu, 08 Nov 2007 16:06:46 +0000
- To: public-sml@w3.org
- CC:
http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=5040 ------- Comment #7 from virginia.smith@hp.com 2007-11-08 16:06 ------- TargetType cannot be considered violated based solely on whether a target is unresolved or not. Consider the use case where the schema author does not want to make the target required but, if present, must be of a specific type. In other words: sml:ref="true", sml:nilref="false", targetRequired="false", targetType="myType" and no target In this case, we cannot consider targetType to be violated for an unresolved reference.
Received on Thursday, 8 November 2007 16:06:53 UTC