- From: <bugzilla@wiggum.w3.org>
- Date: Tue, 06 Nov 2007 18:57:38 +0000
- To: public-sml@w3.org
- CC:
http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=5070 ------- Comment #11 from kumarp@microsoft.com 2007-11-06 18:57 ------- -----Original Message----- From: Kumar Pandit Sent: Monday, November 05, 2007 9:46 AM To: Smith, Virginia (HP Software); public-sml@w3.org Subject: RE: [Bug 5070] Requirement for validator to implement deref() I agree. 'MUST support' sounds good. If everyone is ok with this, we can go with 'MUST support'. -----Original Message----- From: Smith, Virginia (HP Software) [mailto:virginia.smith@hp.com] Sent: Saturday, November 03, 2007 3:46 PM To: Kumar Pandit; public-sml@w3.org Subject: RE: [Bug 5070] Requirement for validator to implement deref() I'm ok with that. I assume that a reasonable interpretation of this sentence is that a validator is free to make use of a 3rd party implementation of the deref() function... "MUST support" also sounds good.
Received on Tuesday, 6 November 2007 18:57:45 UTC