[Bug 5040] Hanlding of reference constraints on different kinds of elements

http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=5040


kumarp@microsoft.com changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
         AssignedTo|cmsmcq@w3.org               |kumarp@microsoft.com




------- Comment #9 from kumarp@microsoft.com  2007-11-09 02:51 -------
Proposal:
Based on the resolution in the previsous comment, make the following suggested
changes:

[1]
In section "4.1.2.4 Resolving an SML reference to assess its validity",
add the following line just before bullet 2.a:

a. If the attempt to resolve fails for at least one scheme then the model
validity state is declared to be unknown.

[2]
Both '?' values in the table (in comment# 2) should be 'Satisfied'.

==========================================

Note:
The intent of the change# 1 is to ensure that we distinguish between the 2
sub-cases of 'unresolved'.

a. the default retreival action of a scheme cannot be completed due to any
runtime condition (such as network error, etc.) ==> this leads to model
validity being unknown

b. the default retreival action of a scheme successfully completes but returns
an empty nodeset ==> this is the only case of 'unresolved'.

Received on Friday, 9 November 2007 02:51:09 UTC