- From: Wilson, Kirk D <Kirk.Wilson@ca.com>
- Date: Tue, 13 Nov 2007 09:32:58 -0500
- To: "Kumar Pandit" <kumarp@windows.microsoft.com>, <public-sml@w3.org>
"EPR gurus"--that's funny. Before we can decide how the EPR scheme is to be resolved, we have to decide what it is going to look it. I'm drafting a straw-man proposal on that. Kirk Wilson, Ph.D. Research Staff Member CA Labs 603 823-7146 -----Original Message----- From: public-sml-request@w3.org [mailto:public-sml-request@w3.org] On Behalf Of Kumar Pandit Sent: Tuesday, November 13, 2007 12:50 AM To: public-sml@w3.org Cc: Kumar Pandit Subject: FW: [Bug 5241] define how the SML URI scheme is resolved Team, I have added a proposal for this bug. Please reply to this email if you are not comfortable with this proposal. Can the EPR gurus add a similar proposal to bug# 5242 (define how the EPR scheme is resolved)? ------- Comment #1 from kumarp@microsoft.com 2007-11-13 05:40 ------- Proposal: Replace the current text of bullet 2 in section 4.2.1 SML URI scheme. 2. The SML URI scheme is resolved using the following steps: a. A document is obtained by dereferencing the URI, sans fragment identifier, using the appropriate operation defined for the scheme used in that URI. If there is no document retrieved, the scheme is unresolved. b. If a fragment identifier is not present in the URI, the root element of the retrieved document is returned. c. If a fragment identifier is present in the URI, the fragment identifier is applied to the root element of the retrieved document and the resulting node-set is returned. Reasons: A URI is a broadly defined term. Although most URIs fit into the 'resource access' paradigm, not all do (for example, the mailto scheme). The specific operations supported for a given URI scheme depend on the scheme definition. There is no standard set of common operations meaningful across all URI schemes. This means that it is not possible to define a set of operations required for dereferencing a URI because it depends on the scheme used. Since the sml:uri definition does not place any restriction on the schemes that can be used, it is not possible to define the set of operations to be performed in order to dereference sml:uri. Consequently, we define this simply as "dereference the URI using the appropriate operation defined for the scheme used".
Received on Tuesday, 13 November 2007 14:33:57 UTC