- From: <bugzilla@wiggum.w3.org>
- Date: Mon, 05 Nov 2007 16:52:29 +0000
- To: public-sml@w3.org
- CC:
http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=5248 Summary: What does it mean if <locator> is not resolved Product: SML Version: FPWD Platform: PC OS/Version: Windows XP Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: P2 Component: Interchange Format AssignedTo: cmsmcq@w3.org ReportedBy: sandygao@ca.ibm.com QAContact: public-sml@w3.org BugsThisDependsOn: 5118 The current IF draft has: "A conforming SML-IF consumer MAY locate a referred to document. If a conforming SML-IF consumer chooses to not locate a referred to document, it SHOULD make its invoker aware of this condition." The spec should be clear about what it means if either of the following is true (both are allowed): - The consumer doesn't attempt to resolve documentURI (or other mechanism used by <locator>) - The consumer does attempt to resolve it but failed. Should it be: a An error b Treated as if containing <document> is not in the IF document c Treated as if the interchange set doesn't not contain this document ... Difference between (b) and (c) is that (b) will hide errors like duplicate aliases and (c) won't. I prefer (c).
Received on Monday, 5 November 2007 16:52:39 UTC