RE: [Bug 4995] Scoping of sml identity constraints (key, keyref, unique)

I support this proposal.  Hopefully, it can be approved on Thurs
conference call.  (In absentia, I wish to vote "yes".) 

Kirk Wilson, Ph.D.
Research Staff Member
CA Labs
603 823-7146
 

-----Original Message-----
From: public-sml-request@w3.org [mailto:public-sml-request@w3.org] On
Behalf Of bugzilla@wiggum.w3.org
Sent: Wednesday, November 07, 2007 5:59 PM
To: public-sml@w3.org
Subject: [Bug 4995] Scoping of sml identity constraints (key, keyref,
unique)


http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=4995





------- Comment #6 from virginia.smith@hp.com  2007-11-07 22:59 -------
Per our discussion on Nov 1, I think that SML should accommodate 2
scenarios:
1 - the desired sml:key is already available. Scoping reduces the
proliferation
of the same sml:key and achieves other benefits as in comment #4.
2 - the desired sml:key is not available. In this case, the sml:key can
reside
with the sml:keyref element as in comment #2, 2nd example.

Received on Wednesday, 7 November 2007 23:28:59 UTC