[Bug 4675] add text in section 5.3.3 to require that consumers and producers are required to implement at a minimum the uri scheme

http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=4675


virginia.smith@hp.com changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
           Keywords|editorial                   |needsReview




------- Comment #17 from virginia.smith@hp.com  2007-11-28 00:31 -------
Conformance Criteria section now reads:

5.1 Conformance Criteria

SML-IF defines two levels of conformance for SML-IF Documents:

   1. A level 2 conforming SML-IF Document MUST adhere to all requirements in
this specification as described in the normative sections. In particular, all
non-null SML references in the document MUST contain a URI scheme
representation [SML 1.1].
   2. A level 1 conforming SML-IF Document MUST adhere to all requirements in
this specification as described in the normative sections with the exception
that a URI scheme representation [SML 1.1] is not required for SML references.
An SML-IF Document that contains at least one non-null SML reference which has
no URI scheme representation but satisfies all other SML-IF requirements is a
level 1 conforming SML-IF Document. 

A conforming SML-IF Producer MUST be able to generate a level 2 conforming
SML-IF Document from an SML model.

A conforming SML-IF Consumer MUST process a conforming SML-IF Document using,
in whole or part, semantics defined by this specification. It is OPTIONAL that
a conforming SML-IF Consumer process all elements defined in this
specification, but any element that is processed MUST be processed in a manner
that is consistent with the semantics defined here.

Received on Wednesday, 28 November 2007 00:31:46 UTC