[Bug 5099] sml section 4.1 References most text should be moved into other sections

http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=5099





------- Comment #6 from johnarwe@us.ibm.com  2007-11-15 18:46 -------
Ok with comment 5's changes.

wrt comment 4 and what is being alluded to, it is quite simple once you get
over the (admittedly large) rfc3986 hump.  Each URI as a scheme component.  The
definition of URI schemes is independent of the generic URI syntax represented
in 3986.  Thus a URI (URI reference, to be precise) consists logically of a
"slot" for a URI scheme along with "slots" for other components like query and
fragment.  Conceptually there is a "uses" relationship between a URI instance
and a URI scheme definition.  The SML analog is that each SML reference
instance uses (is compliant with, would be recognized by an omniscient consumer
as being an example of) zero or more SML reference schemes.  SML reference
scheme definitions (in general) are independent of the SML specs.

Received on Thursday, 15 November 2007 18:46:45 UTC