[Bug 4675] add text in section 5.3.3 to require that consumers and producers are required to implement at a minimum the uri scheme

http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=4675


virginia.smith@hp.com changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
             Status|RESOLVED                    |REOPENED
         Resolution|FIXED                       |




------- Comment #14 from virginia.smith@hp.com  2007-11-02 20:18 -------
I think this still needs a review.

1 - the resolution states that we agreed on 2 levels of conformance on the IF
document not on the producer. The IF document using a uri scheme for all refs
is a level 2 conforming document. An IF doc that does not provide a uri scheme
for at least 1 SML ref is a level 1 conformant document. (assuming it conforms
to all other conformance criteria, of course) 

2 - A conformant producer must be -able- to produce an IF document using uri
scheme but a producer that produces an IF document not using uri scheme (if
requested to do so), in my mind is still a conforming producer. It is just not
producing a level 2 conformant document at that moment. 

3 - This needs to be reconciled with the following statement in the same
section which does not require the uri scheme, per se:
First, to successfully interchange documents using such schemes, the sml:ref
elements containing them MUST also contain an sml:ref scheme that is an
interdocument reference in the SML-IF context. 

4 - This bug fix interferes with bug 5121 which removed this section. Need to
get this straightened out.

Received on Friday, 2 November 2007 20:18:26 UTC