[Bug 5112] rule binding concept should move to sml

http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=5112





------- Comment #9 from johnarwe@us.ibm.com  2007-11-15 17:42 -------
As long as Terminology is marked as normative, and/or this text is covered
elsewhere in a normative section, fine.  Since it is making a model validity
assertion, that assertion must be present in a normative section.

For a model to be valid, every
definition and/or instance document in the model must conform to the
constraints defined by every rule document it is bound to. It is permissible
for a rule document to have no bindings associated with it, and for a model
document to be bound to zero rule documents.

Received on Thursday, 15 November 2007 17:43:07 UTC