- From: <bugzilla@wiggum.w3.org>
- Date: Thu, 29 Nov 2007 16:11:42 +0000
- To: public-sml@w3.org
- CC:
http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=5181 ------- Comment #5 from popescu@ca.ibm.com 2007-11-29 16:11 ------- +1 for proposal in comment #4 One question for the case described in bullet d. : d. If both baseURI and primaryAlias are present, combine baseURI with primaryAlias and relative URI to get absolute URI Question:When both baseURI and primaryAlias are present, is it allowed for the primaryAlias to be an absolute URI ? I would incline to say yes; in which case, bullet d should be updated to cover this scenario : d. If both baseURI and primaryAlias are present i. if primaryAlias is a relative URI then combine baseURI with primaryAlias and relative URI to get absolute URI ii. otherwise ignore the baseURI and use only the primaryAlias to create the absolute URI for a relative URI
Received on Thursday, 29 November 2007 16:11:49 UTC