I believe we are very close to a resolution on this bug. Does anyone disagree with this proposal?
Sandy, you had some concerns. Are you ok with this definition?
------- Comment #10<http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=5047> From Kumar Pandit<mailto:kumarp@microsoft.com> 2007-11-01 04:32:01 [reply<http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=5047>] -------
I agree about the need to match elements without a namespace. I am ok with the
definition being:
<xs:complexType name="dataType" mixed="false">
<xs:sequence>
<xs:any processContents="skip" minOccurs="0"/>
</xs:sequence>
</xs:complexType>
We must have the ability to have empty dataType content. It is used to
represent tombstoned documents in one of our scenarios.