- From: <bugzilla@wiggum.w3.org>
- Date: Mon, 26 Nov 2007 08:18:25 +0000
- To: public-sml@w3.org
- CC:
http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=4636 ------- Comment #5 from kumarp@microsoft.com 2007-11-26 08:18 ------- Proposal: Define our own scheme based on the xpointer framework. The scheme is defined as follows: 1. Scheme name: smlxpath1. 2. Scheme BNF: SML_Fragment_ID = ‘smlxpath1’ ‘(‘ XPath1.0_LocationPath ‘)’ 3. sml:uri BNF: SMLURI = URI (‘#’ SML_Fragment_ID)? 4. Namespace binding context: The smlxpath1 scheme inherits the set of namespace bindings available to the containing element. Reasons / More info: 1. We do not have to take normative dependence on schemes that are not w3c Recommendations. 2. We do not have to spend considerable time defining a profile of some other scheme. 3. Implementation impact: a. Must implement Xpointer framework related parsing (as defined by BNF in the xpointer framework). b. Must implement Xpointer framework related escaping mechanism.
Received on Monday, 26 November 2007 08:18:37 UTC