- From: <bugzilla@wiggum.w3.org>
- Date: Wed, 28 Nov 2007 02:55:15 +0000
- To: public-sml@w3.org
- CC:
http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=5291 ------- Comment #2 from kumarp@microsoft.com 2007-11-28 02:55 ------- I do not see the need to add sub-sections that duplicate information already present in sibling sub-sections. In this case, section "4.2.5 Resolving an SML reference" clearly defines the sematics associated with reference resolution/model validity. Repeating a part of that information in sibling section 4.2.2 should be avoided.
Received on Wednesday, 28 November 2007 02:55:20 UTC