public-script-coord@w3.org from January to March 2012 by author

Alex Russell

• Re: Numeric constants vs enumerated strings (Thursday, 16 February)
• Re: Numeric constants vs enumerated strings (Wednesday, 15 February)
• Re: querySelectorAll() -- selecting _immediate_ children of element (Thursday, 19 January)

Allen Wirfs-Brock

• Re: New full Unicode for ES6 idea (Friday, 2 March)
• Re: New full Unicode for ES6 idea (Thursday, 1 March)
• Re: New full Unicode for ES6 idea (Tuesday, 21 February)
• Re: New full Unicode for ES6 idea (Tuesday, 21 February)
• Re: New full Unicode for ES6 idea (Monday, 20 February)
• Re: New full Unicode for ES6 idea (Monday, 20 February)
• Re: New full Unicode for ES6 idea (Monday, 20 February)
• Re: New full Unicode for ES6 idea (Monday, 20 February)
• Re: New full Unicode for ES6 idea (Monday, 20 February)
• Re: New full Unicode for ES6 idea (Monday, 20 February)
• Re: New full Unicode for ES6 idea (Sunday, 19 February)
• Re: New full Unicode for ES6 idea (Sunday, 19 February)
• Re: New full Unicode for ES6 idea (Sunday, 19 February)
• Re: Conversion of ES Number to WebIDL long long and unsigned long long should not throw by default (Monday, 13 February)
• Re: variable declarations shadowing named properties on window (Friday, 6 January)
• Re: variable declarations shadowing named properties on window (Friday, 6 January)
• (no subject) (Friday, 6 January)

Andreas Rossberg

• Re: variable declarations shadowing named properties on window (Thursday, 5 January)

Anne van Kesteren

• Re: [XHR] Constructor behavior seems to be underdefined (Saturday, 31 March)
• Re: [XHR] Constructor behavior seems to be underdefined (Saturday, 31 March)
• Re: [TreatNonCallableAsNull] alternative? (Monday, 12 March)
• Re: [TreatNonCallableAsNull] alternative? (Wednesday, 7 March)
• Re: [WebIDL] change argument names from identifiers (Wednesday, 7 March)
• Re: [TreatNonCallableAsNull] alternative? (Wednesday, 7 March)
• Re: [TreatNonCallableAsNull] alternative? (Tuesday, 6 March)
• Re: New full Unicode for ES6 idea (Saturday, 25 February)
• Re: Specification links in code generated from WebIDL (Friday, 24 February)
• Re: New full Unicode for ES6 idea (Tuesday, 21 February)
• [WebIDL] change argument names from identifiers (Tuesday, 21 February)
• Re: New full Unicode for ES6 idea (Tuesday, 21 February)
• Re: New full Unicode for ES6 idea (Monday, 20 February)
• Re: New full Unicode for ES6 idea (Monday, 20 February)
• Re: New full Unicode for ES6 idea (Monday, 20 February)
• Re: New full Unicode for ES6 idea (Sunday, 19 February)
• Re: [TreatNonCallableAsNull] alternative? (Thursday, 16 February)
• Re: Numeric constants vs enumerated strings (Thursday, 16 February)
• Re: Numeric constants vs enumerated strings (Wednesday, 15 February)
• Re: Numeric constants vs enumerated strings (Wednesday, 15 February)
• Re: [WebIDL] Worry on Enum type - binding seems inconsistently defined (Friday, 3 February)
• Re: no longer treating explicit undefined as a missing, optional argument (Wednesday, 4 January)
• Re: no longer treating explicit undefined as a missing, optional argument (Tuesday, 3 January)

Anton Tayanovskyy

• Optional rule in grammar (Web IDL W3C W.D. 7 Feb 2012) (Monday, 13 February)

Arthur Barstow

• Comments blocking Web IDL Candidate (Thursday, 29 March)
• CfC: publish Candidate Recommendation of Web IDL; deadline March 26 (Monday, 19 March)
• Reminder: RfC: Last Call Working Draft of Web IDL; deadline February 28 (Tuesday, 21 February)
• RfC: Last Call Working Draft of Web IDL; deadline February 28 (Tuesday, 7 February)
• CfC: publish new LCWD of Web IDL; deadline February 3 (Friday, 27 January)
• [WebIDL] Worry on Enum type - binding seems inconsistently defined (Wednesday, 11 January)
• Re: RfC: pre-LC comments for Web IDL; deadline January 17 (Tuesday, 3 January)
• RfC: pre-LC comments for Web IDL; deadline January 17 (Tuesday, 3 January)

Boris Zbarsky

• Re: [Public WebGL] Should WebGLContextAttributes be a callback interface? (Saturday, 31 March)
• Re: [Public WebGL] Should WebGLContextAttributes be a callback interface? (Saturday, 31 March)
• Re: [XHR] Constructor behavior seems to be underdefined (Saturday, 31 March)
• Re: [XHR] Constructor behavior seems to be underdefined (Saturday, 31 March)
• [XHR] Constructor behavior seems to be underdefined (Friday, 30 March)
• [webidl] Unions involving a primitive and a string don't make any sense (Friday, 30 March)
• Re: Constructible Exceptions (Sunday, 25 March)
• Re: [TreatNonCallableAsNull] alternative? (Wednesday, 7 March)
• Re: New full Unicode for ES6 idea (Saturday, 25 February)
• Re: Getters establish own properties, or why is [NamedPropertiesObject] discouraged? (Saturday, 25 February)
• Re: Getters establish own properties, or why is [NamedPropertiesObject] discouraged? (Friday, 24 February)
• Re: New full Unicode for ES6 idea (Sunday, 19 February)
• Re: New full Unicode for ES6 idea (Sunday, 19 February)
• Re: New full Unicode for ES6 idea (Sunday, 19 February)
• Re: [TreatNonCallableAsNull] alternative? (Thursday, 16 February)
• Re: Conversion of ES Number to WebIDL long long and unsigned long long should not throw by default (Monday, 13 February)
• Re: Conversion of ES Number to WebIDL long long and unsigned long long should not throw by default (Monday, 13 February)
• Conversion of ES Number to WebIDL long long and unsigned long long should not throw by default (Wednesday, 8 February)
• Re: variable declarations shadowing named properties on window (Monday, 30 January)
• Re: variable declarations shadowing named properties on window (Monday, 30 January)
• Re: variable declarations shadowing named properties on window (Monday, 30 January)
• Re: variable declarations shadowing named properties on window (Friday, 27 January)
• Re: variable declarations shadowing named properties on window (Monday, 23 January)
• Re: variable declarations shadowing named properties on window (Saturday, 7 January)
• Re: variable declarations shadowing named properties on window (Friday, 6 January)
• Re: variable declarations shadowing named properties on window (Friday, 6 January)
• Re: variable declarations shadowing named properties on window (Friday, 6 January)
• Re: variable declarations shadowing named properties on window (Friday, 6 January)
• Re: variable declarations shadowing named properties on window (Friday, 6 January)
• Re: variable declarations shadowing named properties on window (Thursday, 5 January)
• Re: variable declarations shadowing named properties on window (Thursday, 5 January)
• Re: variable declarations shadowing named properties on window (Thursday, 5 January)
• Re: variable declarations shadowing named properties on window (Thursday, 5 January)
• Re: variable declarations shadowing named properties on window (Thursday, 5 January)
• Re: variable declarations shadowing named properties on window (Thursday, 5 January)
• Re: variable declarations shadowing named properties on window (Wednesday, 4 January)
• Re: variable declarations shadowing named properties on window (Wednesday, 4 January)
• Re: variable declarations shadowing named properties on window (Wednesday, 4 January)
• Re: variable declarations shadowing named properties on window (Wednesday, 4 January)
• Re: variable declarations shadowing named properties on window (Wednesday, 4 January)
• Re: variable declarations shadowing named properties on window (Wednesday, 4 January)

Brendan Eich

• Re: [XHR] Constructor behavior seems to be underdefined (Saturday, 31 March)
• Re: New full Unicode for ES6 idea (Saturday, 3 March)
• Re: New full Unicode for ES6 idea (Tuesday, 28 February)
• Re: New full Unicode for ES6 idea (Saturday, 25 February)
• Re: New full Unicode for ES6 idea (Wednesday, 22 February)
• Re: New full Unicode for ES6 idea (Wednesday, 22 February)
• Re: New full Unicode for ES6 idea (Tuesday, 21 February)
• Re: New full Unicode for ES6 idea (Tuesday, 21 February)
• Re: New full Unicode for ES6 idea (Tuesday, 21 February)
• Re: New full Unicode for ES6 idea (Tuesday, 21 February)
• Re: New full Unicode for ES6 idea (Tuesday, 21 February)
• Re: New full Unicode for ES6 idea (Monday, 20 February)
• Re: New full Unicode for ES6 idea (Monday, 20 February)
• Re: New full Unicode for ES6 idea (Monday, 20 February)
• Re: New full Unicode for ES6 idea (Monday, 20 February)
• Re: New full Unicode for ES6 idea (Monday, 20 February)
• Re: New full Unicode for ES6 idea (Monday, 20 February)
• Re: New full Unicode for ES6 idea (Monday, 20 February)
• Re: New full Unicode for ES6 idea (Sunday, 19 February)
• Re: New full Unicode for ES6 idea (Sunday, 19 February)
• Re: New full Unicode for ES6 idea (Sunday, 19 February)
• Re: New full Unicode for ES6 idea (Sunday, 19 February)
• Re: New full Unicode for ES6 idea (Sunday, 19 February)
• Re: New full Unicode for ES6 idea (Sunday, 19 February)
• Re: New full Unicode for ES6 idea (Sunday, 19 February)
• Re: New full Unicode for ES6 idea (Sunday, 19 February)
• Re: New full Unicode for ES6 idea (Sunday, 19 February)
• Re: New full Unicode for ES6 idea (Sunday, 19 February)
• Re: New full Unicode for ES6 idea (Sunday, 19 February)
• Re: New full Unicode for ES6 idea (Sunday, 19 February)
• Re: New full Unicode for ES6 idea (Sunday, 19 February)
• Re: New full Unicode for ES6 idea (Sunday, 19 February)
• Re: New full Unicode for ES6 idea (Sunday, 19 February)
• New full Unicode for ES6 idea (Sunday, 19 February)
• Re: Tizen's TZDate (Wednesday, 1 February)
• Re: variable declarations shadowing named properties on window (Friday, 6 January)

bugzilla@jessica.w3.org

• [Bug 16447] Inheritance loop (Saturday, 31 March)
• [Bug 16570] minor typo - s/,/\./ (Saturday, 31 March)
• [Bug 16536] Redundant statement (Saturday, 31 March)
• [Bug 16536] Redundant statement (Friday, 30 March)
• [Bug 16539] The undefined date type (Friday, 30 March)
• [Bug 16536] Redundant statement (Friday, 30 March)
• [Bug 16570] New: minor typo - s/,/\./ (Thursday, 29 March)
• [Bug 16074] Define |[TreatNonCallableAsNull] Function?| as a builtin (Wednesday, 28 March)
• [Bug 16536] Redundant statement (Tuesday, 27 March)
• [Bug 16537] Interface types - Implements is ambiguous (Tuesday, 27 March)
• [Bug 16537] Interface types - Implements is ambiguous (Tuesday, 27 March)
• [Bug 16539] The undefined date type (Tuesday, 27 March)
• [Bug 16537] Interface types - Implements is ambiguous (Tuesday, 27 March)
• [Bug 16537] Interface types - Implements is ambiguous (Tuesday, 27 March)
• [Bug 16537] Interface types - Implements is ambiguous (Tuesday, 27 March)
• [Bug 16537] Interface types - Implements is ambiguous (Tuesday, 27 March)
• [Bug 16539] New: The undefined date type (Tuesday, 27 March)
• [Bug 16537] Interface types - Implements is ambiguous (Tuesday, 27 March)
• [Bug 16537] Interface types - Implements is ambiguous (Tuesday, 27 March)
• [Bug 16537] Interface types - Implements is ambiguous (Tuesday, 27 March)
• [Bug 16537] New: Interface types - Implements is ambiguous (Tuesday, 27 March)
• [Bug 16536] Redundant statement (Tuesday, 27 March)
• [Bug 16536] New: Redundant statement (Tuesday, 27 March)
• [Bug 16457] IDL exceptions as platform objects (Tuesday, 27 March)
• [Bug 16528] Rounding (Tuesday, 27 March)
• [Bug 16526] sign(x) not linked (Tuesday, 27 March)
• [Bug 16450] Class String (Tuesday, 27 March)
• [Bug 16471] Exception "type" (Tuesday, 27 March)
• [Bug 16528] Rounding (Monday, 26 March)
• [Bug 16528] New: Rounding (Monday, 26 March)
• [Bug 16526] sign(x) not linked (Monday, 26 March)
• [Bug 16526] New: sign(x) not linked (Monday, 26 March)
• [Bug 16498] exception interface prototype object (Saturday, 24 March)
• [Bug 16496] Confusing statement (Saturday, 24 March)
• [Bug 16495] Missing link to "exception" definition (Saturday, 24 March)
• [Bug 16494] Missing link to "exception field" (Saturday, 24 March)
• [Bug 16498] New: exception interface prototype object (Friday, 23 March)
• [Bug 16496] New: Confusing statement (Friday, 23 March)
• [Bug 16495] New: Missing link to "exception" definition (Friday, 23 March)
• [Bug 16494] New: Missing link to "exception field" (Friday, 23 March)
• [Bug 16438] ECMAScript environment (Wednesday, 21 March)
• [Bug 16439] Avoid reserved words for variables (Wednesday, 21 March)
• [Bug 16440] interface prototype object. (Wednesday, 21 March)
• [Bug 16455] Using platform object example (Wednesday, 21 March)
• [Bug 16457] IDL exceptions as platform objects (Wednesday, 21 March)
• [Bug 16454] SomethingError (Wednesday, 21 March)
• [Bug 16447] Inheritance loop (Wednesday, 21 March)
• [Bug 16450] Class String (Wednesday, 21 March)
• [Bug 16471] Exception "type" (Wednesday, 21 March)
• [Bug 16471] Exception "type" (Wednesday, 21 March)
• [Bug 16470] Exception message contruction (Wednesday, 21 March)
• [Bug 16471] Exception "type" (Wednesday, 21 March)
• [Bug 16471] Exception "type" (Wednesday, 21 March)
• [Bug 16471] Exception "type" (Wednesday, 21 March)
• [Bug 16471] Exception "type" (Wednesday, 21 March)
• [Bug 16471] Exception "type" (Wednesday, 21 March)
• [Bug 16471] Exception "type" (Wednesday, 21 March)
• [Bug 16471] Exception "type" (Wednesday, 21 March)
• [Bug 16471] Exception "type" (Wednesday, 21 March)
• [Bug 16471] Exception "type" (Wednesday, 21 March)
• [Bug 16471] New: Exception "type" (Wednesday, 21 March)
• [Bug 16470] Exception message contruction (Wednesday, 21 March)
• [Bug 16470] New: Exception message contruction (Wednesday, 21 March)
• [Bug 16447] Inheritance loop (Wednesday, 21 March)
• [Bug 16454] SomethingError (Tuesday, 20 March)
• [Bug 16454] SomethingError (Tuesday, 20 March)
• [Bug 16457] IDL exceptions as platform objects (Tuesday, 20 March)
• [Bug 16457] New: IDL exceptions as platform objects (Tuesday, 20 March)
• [Bug 16455] New: Using platform object example (Tuesday, 20 March)
• [Bug 16454] SomethingError (Tuesday, 20 March)
• [Bug 16454] New: SomethingError (Tuesday, 20 March)
• [Bug 16450] New: Class String (Tuesday, 20 March)
• [Bug 16447] New: Inheritance loop (Tuesday, 20 March)
• [Bug 16418] editorial - change "is to be" to "SHOULD be" in warning text (Monday, 19 March)
• [Bug 16440] New: interface prototype object. (Monday, 19 March)
• [Bug 16439] New: Avoid reserved words for variables (Monday, 19 March)
• [Bug 16438] New: ECMAScript environment (Monday, 19 March)
• [Bug 16418] editorial - change "is to be" to "SHOULD be" in warning text (Monday, 19 March)
• [Bug 16417] refer to "callback[s]" as "callback function[s]" (Monday, 19 March)
• [Bug 16420] nullable or non-nullable sequence type == sequence type ? (Monday, 19 March)
• [Bug 16420] nullable or non-nullable sequence type == sequence type ? (Monday, 19 March)
• [Bug 16419] order of partial interface definitions not in the same IDL fragment (Monday, 19 March)
• [Bug 16418] editorial - change "is to be" to "SHOULD be" in warning text (Monday, 19 March)
• [Bug 16416] missing implements statement in example of implements statement (Monday, 19 March)
• [Bug 16386] Issue in example provided for es-sequence in WebIDL. (Monday, 19 March)
• [Bug 15986] Specify exactly how and when ECMAScript arguments are evaluated (Monday, 19 March)
• [Bug 16420] New: nullable or non-nullable sequence type == sequence type ? (Sunday, 18 March)
• [Bug 16419] New: order of partial interface definitions not in the same IDL fragment (Sunday, 18 March)
• [Bug 16418] New: editorial - change "is to be" to "SHOULD be" in warning text (Sunday, 18 March)
• [Bug 16417] New: refer to "callback[s]" as "callback function[s]" (Sunday, 18 March)
• [Bug 16416] New: missing implements statement in example of implements statement (Sunday, 18 March)
• [Bug 16386] New: Issue in example provided for es-sequence in WebIDL. (Thursday, 15 March)
• [Bug 15986] Specify exactly how and when ECMAScript arguments are evaluated (Wednesday, 14 March)
• [Bug 15986] Specify exactly how and when ECMAScript arguments are evaluated (Wednesday, 14 March)
• [Bug 15986] Specify exactly how and when ECMAScript arguments are evaluated (Wednesday, 14 March)
• [Bug 15986] Specify exactly how and when ECMAScript arguments are evaluated (Tuesday, 13 March)
• [Bug 15986] Specify exactly how and when ECMAScript arguments are evaluated (Tuesday, 13 March)
• [Bug 16334] Editorial: operations (Tuesday, 13 March)
• [Bug 16334] New: Editorial: operations (Monday, 12 March)
• [Bug 16075] Make a float/double type that excludes NaN/Infinity/-Infinity (Monday, 12 March)
• [Bug 16075] Make a float/double type that excludes NaN/Infinity/-Infinity (Wednesday, 7 March)
• [Bug 16075] Make a float/double type that excludes NaN/Infinity/-Infinity (Wednesday, 7 March)
• [Bug 16075] Make a float/double type that excludes NaN/Infinity/-Infinity (Tuesday, 6 March)
• [Bug 16074] Define |[TreatNonCallableAsNull] Function?| as a builtin (Tuesday, 6 March)
• [Bug 16074] Define |[TreatNonCallableAsNull] Function?| as a builtin (Tuesday, 6 March)
• [Bug 16075] Make a float/double type that excludes NaN/Infinity/-Infinity (Tuesday, 6 March)
• [Bug 16074] Define |[TreatNonCallableAsNull] Function?| as a builtin (Tuesday, 6 March)
• [Bug 15986] Specify exactly how and when ECMAScript arguments are evaluated (Tuesday, 6 March)
• [Bug 16075] Make a float/double type that excludes NaN/Infinity/-Infinity (Tuesday, 6 March)
• [Bug 16075] Make a float/double type that excludes NaN/Infinity/-Infinity (Tuesday, 6 March)
• [Bug 16075] Make a float/double type that excludes NaN/Infinity/-Infinity (Tuesday, 6 March)
• [Bug 16074] Define |[TreatNonCallableAsNull] Function?| as a builtin (Monday, 5 March)
• [Bug 16075] Make a float/double type that excludes NaN/Infinity/-Infinity (Monday, 5 March)
• [Bug 16074] Define |[TreatNonCallableAsNull] Function?| as a builtin (Monday, 5 March)
• [Bug 16074] Define |[TreatNonCallableAsNull] Function?| as a builtin (Monday, 5 March)
• [Bug 16074] Define |[TreatNonCallableAsNull] Function?| as a builtin (Monday, 5 March)
• [Bug 16074] Define |[TreatNonCallableAsNull] Function?| as a builtin (Monday, 5 March)
• [Bug 16074] Define |[TreatNonCallableAsNull] Function?| as a builtin (Monday, 5 March)
• [Bug 16074] Define |[TreatNonCallableAsNull] Function?| as a builtin (Monday, 5 March)
• [Bug 16075] Make a float/double type that excludes NaN/Infinity/-Infinity (Monday, 5 March)
• [Bug 16075] Make a float/double type that excludes NaN/Infinity/-Infinity (Monday, 5 March)
• [Bug 16074] Define |[TreatNonCallableAsNull] Function?| as a builtin (Monday, 5 March)
• [Bug 16220] Type: "decalred" (Sunday, 4 March)
• [Bug 16220] New: Type: "decalred" (Saturday, 3 March)
• [Bug 16098] callback interfaces with constants should have no interface prototype object (Thursday, 1 March)
• [Bug 16098] callback interfaces with constants should have no interface prototype object (Thursday, 1 March)
• [Bug 16098] callback interfaces with constants should have no interface prototype object (Thursday, 1 March)
• [Bug 16098] callback interfaces with constants should have no interface prototype object (Thursday, 1 March)
• [Bug 16098] callback interfaces with constants should have no interface prototype object (Friday, 24 February)
• [Bug 16098] callback interfaces with constants should have no interface prototype object (Friday, 24 February)
• [Bug 16098] callback interfaces with constants should have no interface prototype object (Friday, 24 February)
• [Bug 16098] New: callback interfaces with constants should have no interface prototype object (Friday, 24 February)
• [Bug 16014] Make it clear that callbacks should only be used for Function (Thursday, 23 February)
• [Bug 16014] Make it clear that callbacks should only be used for Function (Thursday, 23 February)
• [Bug 16075] Make a float/double type that excludes NaN/Infinity/-Infinity (Wednesday, 22 February)
• [Bug 16075] Make a float/double type that excludes NaN/Infinity/-Infinity (Wednesday, 22 February)
• [Bug 16075] New: Make a float/double type that excludes NaN/Infinity/-Infinity (Wednesday, 22 February)
• [Bug 16014] Make it clear that callbacks should only be used for Function (Wednesday, 22 February)
• [Bug 16014] Make it clear that callbacks should only be used for Function (Wednesday, 22 February)
• [Bug 16014] Make it clear that callbacks should only be used for Function (Wednesday, 22 February)
• [Bug 16014] Make it clear that callbacks should only be used for Function (Wednesday, 22 February)
• [Bug 16074] Define |[TreatNonCallableAsNull] Function?| as a builtin (Wednesday, 22 February)
• [Bug 16074] Define |[TreatNonCallableAsNull] Function?| as a builtin (Wednesday, 22 February)
• [Bug 16074] New: Define |[TreatNonCallableAsNull] Function?| as a builtin (Wednesday, 22 February)
• [Bug 15986] Specify exactly how and when ECMAScript arguments are evaluated (Tuesday, 21 February)
• [Bug 15986] Specify exactly how and when ECMAScript arguments are evaluated (Monday, 20 February)
• [Bug 15986] Specify exactly how and when ECMAScript arguments are evaluated (Monday, 20 February)
• [Bug 15986] Specify exactly how and when ECMAScript arguments are evaluated (Monday, 20 February)
• [Bug 15986] Specify exactly how and when ECMAScript arguments are evaluated (Monday, 20 February)
• [Bug 15986] Specify exactly how and when ECMAScript arguments are evaluated (Monday, 20 February)
• [Bug 15986] Specify exactly how and when ECMAScript arguments are evaluated (Monday, 20 February)
• [Bug 15986] Specify exactly how and when ECMAScript arguments are evaluated (Monday, 20 February)
• [Bug 16014] Make it clear that callbacks should only be used for Function (Friday, 17 February)
• [Bug 16014] New: Make it clear that callbacks should only be used for Function (Friday, 17 February)
• [Bug 15986] Specify exactly how and when ECMAScript arguments are evaluated (Wednesday, 15 February)
• [Bug 15986] Specify exactly how and when ECMAScript arguments are evaluated (Wednesday, 15 February)
• [Bug 15986] Specify exactly how and when ECMAScript arguments are evaluated (Wednesday, 15 February)
• [Bug 15986] Specify exactly how and when ECMAScript arguments are evaluated (Wednesday, 15 February)
• [Bug 15986] Specify exactly how and when ECMAScript arguments are evaluated (Wednesday, 15 February)
• [Bug 15986] Specify exactly how and when ECMAScript arguments are evaluated (Tuesday, 14 February)
• [Bug 15986] Specify exactly how and when ECMAScript arguments are evaluated (Tuesday, 14 February)
• [Bug 15986] Specify exactly how and when ECMAScript arguments are evaluated (Tuesday, 14 February)
• [Bug 15986] Specify exactly how and when ECMAScript arguments are evaluated (Tuesday, 14 February)
• [Bug 15986] Specify exactly how and when ECMAScript arguments are evaluated (Tuesday, 14 February)
• [Bug 15986] Specify exactly how and when ECMAScript arguments are evaluated (Tuesday, 14 February)
• [Bug 15986] Specify exactly how and when ECMAScript arguments are evaluated (Tuesday, 14 February)
• [Bug 15986] New: Specify exactly how and when ECMAScript arguments are evaluated (Tuesday, 14 February)
• [Bug 15762] 3.1 Names / constants clarification (Monday, 30 January)
• [Bug 15765] Replaceable interface (Monday, 30 January)
• [Bug 15765] Replaceable interface (Monday, 30 January)
• [Bug 15765] Replaceable interface (Monday, 30 January)
• [Bug 15762] 3.1 Names / constants clarification (Monday, 30 January)
• [Bug 15765] Replaceable interface (Monday, 30 January)
• [Bug 15764] Review notes for normative statements (Sunday, 29 January)
• [Bug 15765] Replaceable interface (Sunday, 29 January)
• [Bug 15763] Redundant requirement about an interface inheriting from itself (Sunday, 29 January)
• [Bug 15766] Typo s/token/tokens/ (Sunday, 29 January)
• [Bug 15762] 3.1 Names / constants clarification (Sunday, 29 January)
• [Bug 12385] Consider adding function types or a simpler definition for [Callback] interfaces with a single operation (Sunday, 29 January)
• [Bug 15765] Replaceable interface (Sunday, 29 January)
• [Bug 15766] New: Typo s/token/tokens/ (Saturday, 28 January)
• [Bug 15765] New: Replaceable interface (Saturday, 28 January)
• [Bug 15764] New: Review notes for normative statements (Saturday, 28 January)
• [Bug 15763] New: Redundant requirement about an interface inheriting from itself (Saturday, 28 January)
• [Bug 15762] New: 3.1 Names / constants clarification (Saturday, 28 January)
• [Bug 12385] Consider adding function types or a simpler definition for [Callback] interfaces with a single operation (Saturday, 28 January)
• [Bug 13166] operation calling algorithm doesn't work for static operations (Monday, 23 January)
• [Bug 15412] simplify or remove the definitions of "platform object" and "user object" (Monday, 23 January)
• [Bug 15411] ES to IDL conversion algorithms shouldn't accept values that the overload resolution algorithm wouldn't (Monday, 23 January)
• [Bug 15412] New: simplify or remove the definitions of "platform object" and "user object" (Wednesday, 4 January)
• [Bug 15411] New: ES to IDL conversion algorithms shouldn't accept values that the overload resolution algorithm wouldn't (Wednesday, 4 January)

Cameron McCormack

• Re: [XHR] Constructor behavior seems to be underdefined (Saturday, 31 March)
• Re: [webidl] Unions involving a primitive and a string don't make any sense (Saturday, 31 March)
• Re: [Bug 16450] Class String (Tuesday, 27 March)
• Re: IDL grammar nits (Tuesday, 27 March)
• Re: Constructible Exceptions (Monday, 26 March)
• Re: Constructible Exceptions (Sunday, 25 March)
• Re: Constructible Exceptions (Sunday, 25 March)
• Re: Should binding section be rewritten more algorithmically? (Saturday, 24 March)
• Re: Constructible Exceptions (Saturday, 24 March)
• Re: WebIDL "Products", was Re: CR exit criteria for Web IDL (Saturday, 24 March)
• Re: [WebIDL] LC Comment - partial dictionary (Saturday, 24 March)
• Re: any type conversion (Tuesday, 20 March)
• CR exit criteria for Web IDL (Tuesday, 20 March)
• Re: [TreatNonCallableAsNull] alternative? (Monday, 12 March)
• Re: [TreatNonCallableAsNull] alternative? (Monday, 12 March)
• Re: [WebIDL] change argument names from identifiers (Sunday, 11 March)
• Re: [TreatNonCallableAsNull] alternative? (Tuesday, 6 March)
• Re: [TreatNonCallableAsNull] alternative? (Tuesday, 6 March)
• Re: [TreatNonCallableAsNull] alternative? (Tuesday, 6 March)
• Re: Conversion of ES Number to WebIDL long long and unsigned long long should not throw by default (Monday, 5 March)
• Re: [WebIDL] change argument names from identifiers (Monday, 5 March)
• Re: Specification links in code generated from WebIDL (Thursday, 1 March)
• Re: [Webidl] Remove links to ECMASCript PDF document (Thursday, 1 March)
• Re: Optional rule in grammar (Web IDL W3C W.D. 7 Feb 2012) (Thursday, 1 March)
• Re: Getters establish own properties, or why is [NamedPropertiesObject] discouraged? (Saturday, 25 February)
• Re: Getters establish own properties, or why is [NamedPropertiesObject] discouraged? (Saturday, 25 February)
• Re: namegetter on prototype? (was Re: [cssom] CSSStyleDeclaration) (Friday, 24 February)
• Re: Getters establish own properties, or why is [NamedPropertiesObject] discouraged? (Friday, 24 February)
• Re: New full Unicode for ES6 idea (Monday, 20 February)
• Re: [WebIDL] LC Comment - partial dictionary (Sunday, 12 February)
• Re: variable declarations shadowing named properties on window (Tuesday, 31 January)
• Re: variable declarations shadowing named properties on window (Monday, 30 January)
• Re: Math method to calculate root for arbitrary exponent (e.g. cube root) (Sunday, 29 January)
• Re: variable declarations shadowing named properties on window (Sunday, 29 January)
• Re: variable declarations shadowing named properties on window (Sunday, 29 January)
• Re: CfC: publish new LCWD of Web IDL; deadline February 3 (Saturday, 28 January)
• Re: RfC: pre-LC comments for Web IDL; deadline January 17 (Friday, 27 January)
• Re: variable declarations shadowing named properties on window (Friday, 27 January)
• Re: RfC: pre-LC comments for Web IDL; deadline January 17 (Wednesday, 25 January)
• Re: RfC: pre-LC comments for Web IDL; deadline January 17 (Wednesday, 25 January)
• Re: [WebIDL] Feedback on getter and setter attribute algorithms (Monday, 23 January)
• Re: Omissions in IDL sequence and IDL array conversion to ES array (Monday, 23 January)
• Re: variable declarations shadowing named properties on window (Monday, 23 January)
• Re: [WebIDL] Worry on Enum type - binding seems inconsistently defined (Thursday, 12 January)
• Re: variable declarations shadowing named properties on window (Saturday, 7 January)
• Re: variable declarations shadowing named properties on window (Saturday, 7 January)
• Re: variable declarations shadowing named properties on window (Friday, 6 January)
• Re: variable declarations shadowing named properties on window (Friday, 6 January)
• Re: variable declarations shadowing named properties on window (Thursday, 5 January)
• Re: variable declarations shadowing named properties on window (Thursday, 5 January)
• Re: Omissions in IDL sequence and IDL array conversion to ES array (Thursday, 5 January)
• Re: variable declarations shadowing named properties on window (Thursday, 5 January)
• Re: variable declarations shadowing named properties on window (Thursday, 5 January)
• Re: Omissions in IDL sequence and IDL array conversion to ES array (Thursday, 5 January)
• Re: Grammar for Union Types (Thursday, 5 January)
• Re: no longer treating explicit undefined as a missing, optional argument (Thursday, 5 January)
• Re: variable declarations shadowing named properties on window (Wednesday, 4 January)
• Re: callback interface not LL(1) (Wednesday, 4 January)
• Re: Grammar for Union Types (Wednesday, 4 January)
• Re: Omissions in IDL sequence and IDL array conversion to ES array (Wednesday, 4 January)
• Re: Omissions in IDL sequence and IDL array conversion to ES array (Wednesday, 4 January)
• Re: no longer treating explicit undefined as a missing, optional argument (Wednesday, 4 January)
• variable declarations shadowing named properties on window (Wednesday, 4 January)

Charles McCathieNevile

• Re: CfC: publish Candidate Recommendation of Web IDL; deadline March 26 (Monday, 19 March)
• Re: Specification links in code generated from WebIDL (Thursday, 23 February)
• Re: RfC: pre-LC comments for Web IDL; deadline January 17 (Tuesday, 24 January)

David Bruant

• Re: New full Unicode for ES6 idea (Sunday, 19 February)
• Re: New full Unicode for ES6 idea (Sunday, 19 February)
• [WebIDL] Feedback on getter and setter attribute algorithms (Sunday, 8 January)

Dominique Hazael-Massieux

• Re: CfC: publish Candidate Recommendation of Web IDL; deadline March 26 (Tuesday, 20 March)
• Re: Numeric constants vs enumerated strings (Wednesday, 15 February)
• Re: Numeric constants vs enumerated strings (Wednesday, 15 February)
• Re: Grammar for Union Types (Wednesday, 4 January)
• Re: Grammar for Union Types (Wednesday, 4 January)
• Re: callback interface not LL(1) (Wednesday, 4 January)
• callback interface not LL(1) (Tuesday, 3 January)
• Grammar for Union Types (Tuesday, 3 January)

Erik Corry

• Re: New full Unicode for ES6 idea (Friday, 2 March)
• Re: New full Unicode for ES6 idea (Friday, 2 March)
• Re: New full Unicode for ES6 idea (Thursday, 1 March)
• Re: New full Unicode for ES6 idea (Thursday, 1 March)

Garrett Smith

• Re: Getters establish own properties, or why is [NamedPropertiesObject] discouraged? (Saturday, 25 February)
• Re: Getters establish own properties, or why is [NamedPropertiesObject] discouraged? (Friday, 24 February)
• Re: Math method to calculate root for arbitrary exponent (e.g. cube root) (Monday, 30 January)

Glenn Adams

• Re: New full Unicode for ES6 idea (Friday, 2 March)
• Re: New full Unicode for ES6 idea (Friday, 2 March)
• Re: New full Unicode for ES6 idea (Thursday, 1 March)
• Re: New full Unicode for ES6 idea (Saturday, 25 February)
• Re: New full Unicode for ES6 idea (Saturday, 25 February)
• namegetter on prototype? (was Re: [cssom] CSSStyleDeclaration) (Thursday, 23 February)

Glenn Maynard

• Re: [Public WebGL] Should WebGLContextAttributes be a callback interface? (Saturday, 31 March)

Harald Alvestrand

• Summary of advice, numeric constants vs enumerated strings (Wednesday, 29 February)
• Numeric constants vs enumerated strings (Wednesday, 15 February)
• Re: [WebIDL] Worry on Enum type - binding seems inconsistently defined (Thursday, 12 January)

Ian Hickson

• Re: variable declarations shadowing named properties on window (Tuesday, 31 January)
• Re: Strict mode callbacks and setTimeout (Tuesday, 17 January)

International confrence SETIT'12

• Happy New Year 2012 (Sunday, 1 January)

James Graham

• Re: Omissions in IDL sequence and IDL array conversion to ES array (Tuesday, 3 January)

João Eiras

• Re: Omissions in IDL sequence and IDL array conversion to ES array (Friday, 6 January)
• Re: Omissions in IDL sequence and IDL array conversion to ES array (Thursday, 5 January)
• Re: Omissions in IDL sequence and IDL array conversion to ES array (Wednesday, 4 January)
• Re: Omissions in IDL sequence and IDL array conversion to ES array (Tuesday, 3 January)
• Omissions in IDL sequence and IDL array conversion to ES array (Tuesday, 3 January)

Jussi Kalliokoski

• Re: New full Unicode for ES6 idea (Sunday, 19 February)

Kang-Hao (Kenny) Lu

• Re: [Webidl] Remove links to ECMASCript PDF document (Thursday, 23 February)

Kyle Huey

• Re: Should binding section be rewritten more algorithmically? (Saturday, 24 March)

Lachlan Hunt

• Re: querySelectorAll() -- selecting _immediate_ children of element (Tuesday, 10 January)

Marat Tanalin | tanalin.com

• Math method to calculate root for arbitrary exponent (e.g. cube root) (Sunday, 29 January)
• Re: querySelectorAll() -- selecting _immediate_ children of element (Thursday, 19 January)
• Re: querySelectorAll() -- selecting _immediate_ children of element (Tuesday, 10 January)
• Re: querySelectorAll() -- selecting _immediate_ children of element (Monday, 9 January)
• Re: querySelectorAll() -- selecting _immediate_ children of element (Monday, 9 January)
• querySelectorAll() -- selecting _immediate_ children of element (Monday, 9 January)

Marcos Caceres

• Re: [Bug 16450] Class String (Tuesday, 27 March)
• Re: [Bug 16450] Class String (Tuesday, 27 March)
• Re: Constructible Exceptions (Monday, 26 March)
• Re: Constructible Exceptions (Sunday, 25 March)
• Re: Constructible Exceptions (Sunday, 25 March)
• Re: Should binding section be rewritten more algorithmically? (Sunday, 25 March)
• Re: Constructible Exceptions (Sunday, 25 March)
• Re: Constructible Exceptions (Sunday, 25 March)
• Re: WebIDL "Products", was Re: CR exit criteria for Web IDL (Saturday, 24 March)
• Re: Should binding section be rewritten more algorithmically? (Friday, 23 March)
• Should binding section be rewritten more algorithmically? (Friday, 23 March)
• Re: Constructible Exceptions (Friday, 23 March)
• Constructible Exceptions (Friday, 23 March)
• WebIDL "Products", was Re: CR exit criteria for Web IDL (Friday, 23 March)
• Re: any type conversion (Tuesday, 20 March)
• any type conversion (Monday, 19 March)
• Re: CfC: publish Candidate Recommendation of Web IDL; deadline March 26 (Monday, 19 March)
• The [ArrayClass], [Clamp], [EnforceRange] and [ImplicitThis] extended attributes. (Saturday, 17 March)
• Re: [TreatNonCallableAsNull] alternative? (Wednesday, 7 March)
• Re: [TreatNonCallableAsNull] alternative? (Wednesday, 7 March)
• Re: [TreatNonCallableAsNull] alternative? (Wednesday, 7 March)
• Re: [TreatNonCallableAsNull] alternative? (Tuesday, 6 March)
• Re: [Webidl] Remove links to ECMASCript PDF document (Thursday, 1 March)
• [Webidl] Remove links to ECMASCript PDF document (Thursday, 23 February)
• Re: [TreatNonCallableAsNull] alternative? (Thursday, 16 February)
• Re: [TreatNonCallableAsNull] alternative? (Thursday, 16 February)
• [TreatNonCallableAsNull] alternative? (Thursday, 16 February)
• Re: Numeric constants vs enumerated strings (Wednesday, 15 February)
• Re: Numeric constants vs enumerated strings (Wednesday, 15 February)
• Re: RfC: pre-LC comments for Web IDL; deadline January 17 (Wednesday, 25 January)
• Re: RfC: pre-LC comments for Web IDL; deadline January 17 (Wednesday, 25 January)
• Re: RfC: pre-LC comments for Web IDL; deadline January 17 (Wednesday, 4 January)
• Re: RfC: pre-LC comments for Web IDL; deadline January 17 (Tuesday, 3 January)

Mark Davis ☕

• Re: New full Unicode for ES6 idea (Monday, 20 February)

Mark S. Miller

• Re: New full Unicode for ES6 idea (Sunday, 19 February)
• Re: New full Unicode for ES6 idea (Sunday, 19 February)
• Re: New full Unicode for ES6 idea (Sunday, 19 February)
• Re: New full Unicode for ES6 idea (Sunday, 19 February)

Norbert Lindenberg

• Re: New full Unicode for ES6 idea (Friday, 2 March)
• Re: New full Unicode for ES6 idea (Wednesday, 22 February)
• Re: New full Unicode for ES6 idea (Wednesday, 22 February)
• Re: New full Unicode for ES6 idea (Tuesday, 21 February)

Ojan Vafai

• Re: variable declarations shadowing named properties on window (Thursday, 5 January)
• Re: variable declarations shadowing named properties on window (Wednesday, 4 January)
• Re: variable declarations shadowing named properties on window (Wednesday, 4 January)
• Re: variable declarations shadowing named properties on window (Wednesday, 4 January)
• Re: variable declarations shadowing named properties on window (Wednesday, 4 January)

Olli Pettay

• Re: [WebIDL] Simplify callbacks (Thursday, 16 February)

Philip Jägenstedt

• Re: Numeric constants vs enumerated strings (Thursday, 16 February)

Phillips, Addison

• RE: New full Unicode for ES6 idea (Tuesday, 21 February)
• RE: New full Unicode for ES6 idea (Tuesday, 21 February)
• RE: New full Unicode for ES6 idea (Tuesday, 21 February)
• RE: New full Unicode for ES6 idea (Tuesday, 21 February)
• RE: New full Unicode for ES6 idea (Monday, 20 February)
• RE: New full Unicode for ES6 idea (Sunday, 19 February)

Robin Berjon

• Re: CfC: publish Candidate Recommendation of Web IDL; deadline March 26 (Wednesday, 21 March)
• Re: Specification links in code generated from WebIDL (Thursday, 23 February)
• Re: Tizen's TZDate (Thursday, 9 February)
• Tizen's TZDate (Tuesday, 31 January)

SETIT 2012

• SETIT 2012 Invitation (Saturday, 3 March)

Shiki Okasaka

• IDL grammar nits (Sunday, 25 March)

Sigbjorn Finne

• Re: Conversion of ES Number to WebIDL long long and unsigned long long should not throw by default (Monday, 13 February)

Simon Pieters

• Re: [TreatNonCallableAsNull] alternative? (Monday, 12 March)

Stefan Haustein

• Re: Specification links in code generated from WebIDL (Friday, 24 February)
• Specification links in code generated from WebIDL (Wednesday, 22 February)

Tab Atkins Jr.

• Re: Getters establish own properties, or why is [NamedPropertiesObject] discouraged? (Friday, 24 February)
• Getters establish own properties, or why is [NamedPropertiesObject] discouraged? (Thursday, 23 February)
• Re: New full Unicode for ES6 idea (Tuesday, 21 February)
• Re: Numeric constants vs enumerated strings (Wednesday, 15 February)
• Re: [WebIDL] Worry on Enum type - binding seems inconsistently defined (Wednesday, 11 January)
• Re: querySelectorAll() -- selecting _immediate_ children of element (Monday, 9 January)

timeless

• Re: Tizen's TZDate (Wednesday, 1 February)

Timothy B. Terriberry

• Re: Numeric constants vs enumerated strings (Wednesday, 15 February)

Tobie Langel

• Re: Numeric constants vs enumerated strings (Wednesday, 15 February)

Travis Leithead

• RE: [WebIDL] LC Comment - partial dictionary (Monday, 26 March)
• RE: Should binding section be rewritten more algorithmically? (Friday, 23 March)
• RE: CfC: publish Candidate Recommendation of Web IDL; deadline March 26 (Monday, 19 March)
• RE: Numeric constants vs enumerated strings (Wednesday, 15 February)
• RE: [WebIDL] LC Comment - partial dictionary (Wednesday, 15 February)
• [WebIDL] LC Comment - partial dictionary (Thursday, 9 February)
• RE: Tizen's TZDate (Wednesday, 1 February)
• RE: variable declarations shadowing named properties on window (Friday, 27 January)
• RE: variable declarations shadowing named properties on window (Friday, 27 January)
• RE: publish new LCWD of Web IDL; deadline February 3 (Friday, 27 January)
• RE: variable declarations shadowing named properties on window (Monday, 9 January)
• RE: variable declarations shadowing named properties on window (Friday, 6 January)
• RE: variable declarations shadowing named properties on window (Friday, 6 January)
• RE: variable declarations shadowing named properties on window (Friday, 6 January)
• RE: variable declarations shadowing named properties on window (Thursday, 5 January)
• RE: variable declarations shadowing named properties on window (Thursday, 5 January)
• RE: variable declarations shadowing named properties on window (Thursday, 5 January)
• RE: variable declarations shadowing named properties on window (Wednesday, 4 January)
• RE: variable declarations shadowing named properties on window (Wednesday, 4 January)
• RE: variable declarations shadowing named properties on window (Wednesday, 4 January)
• RE: variable declarations shadowing named properties on window (Wednesday, 4 January)

Wes Garland

• Re: New full Unicode for ES6 idea (Wednesday, 22 February)
• Re: New full Unicode for ES6 idea (Wednesday, 22 February)
• Re: New full Unicode for ES6 idea (Tuesday, 21 February)
• Re: New full Unicode for ES6 idea (Monday, 20 February)
• Re: New full Unicode for ES6 idea (Monday, 20 February)
• Re: New full Unicode for ES6 idea (Monday, 20 February)
• Re: New full Unicode for ES6 idea (Sunday, 19 February)

Last message date: Saturday, 31 March 2012 21:14:53 UTC