- From: Arthur Barstow <art.barstow@nokia.com>
- Date: Tue, 03 Jan 2012 09:48:03 -0500
- To: ext Marcos Caceres <marcosscaceres@gmail.com>
- CC: public-script-coord <public-script-coord@w3.org>
On 1/3/12 9:29 AM, ext Marcos Caceres wrote: > > On Tuesday, 3 January 2012 at 14:04, Arthur Barstow wrote: > >> Cam has now addressed comments [1] submitted for the 27 September 2011 >> LC of Web IDL. Since the comments resulted in substantial changes to the >> spec, another LCWD will be published. >> >> Rather than immediately starting a CfC to publish a new LCWD, let's >> first have a two week pre-LC Request for Comments period using the >> latest ED as the basis: >> >> http://dev.w3.org/2006/webapi/WebIDL/ >> >> If you have any comments, please send them to public-script-coord@w3.org (mailto:public-script-coord@w3.org) >> by January 17. >> >> -AB >> >> [1] http://dev.w3.org/2006/webapi/WebIDL/lc2.txt >> > > I'm sorry, but can we pretty please just republish? I'm getting annoyed that every time I Google* for WebIDL I end up at the grossly outdated version and have to click and wait for the dev version to come up. Is there any reason to sit around for another few weeks outside the LC phase, or am I missing something? I prefer the additional review period (shorter than YA LC review) especially since, as you noted, the changes since the last publication are substantive. -AB
Received on Tuesday, 3 January 2012 14:50:24 UTC