W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-script-coord@w3.org > January to March 2012

RE: Numeric constants vs enumerated strings

From: Travis Leithead <travis.leithead@microsoft.com>
Date: Wed, 15 Feb 2012 19:31:05 +0000
To: Alex Russell <slightlyoff@google.com>, Marcos Caceres <w3c@marcosc.com>
CC: Dominique Hazael-Massieux <dom@w3.org>, Anne van Kesteren <annevk@opera.com>, "public-script-coord@w3.org" <public-script-coord@w3.org>, Harald Alvestrand <harald@alvestrand.no>, "public-webrtc@w3.org" <public-webrtc@w3.org>
Message-ID: <9768D477C67135458BF978A45BCF9B383821BAB5@TK5EX14MBXW603.wingroup.windeploy.ntdev.microsoft.com>

Sounds like the argument for consistency with previous "readyState" definitions loses to the use the new best-practice approach.

To accommodate both, perhaps you should consider _not_ using the name readyState, and chose another similar-name that can apply the best-practice syntax.

Received on Wednesday, 15 February 2012 19:32:02 UTC

This message: [ Message body ]
Next message: Tab Atkins Jr.: "Re: Numeric constants vs enumerated strings"
Previous message: Alex Russell: "Re: Numeric constants vs enumerated strings"
In reply to: Alex Russell: "Re: Numeric constants vs enumerated strings"
Next in thread: Anne van Kesteren: "Re: Numeric constants vs enumerated strings"
Reply: Anne van Kesteren: "Re: Numeric constants vs enumerated strings"

Mail actions: [ respond to this message ] [ mail a new topic ]
Contemporary messages sorted: [ by date ] [ by thread ] [ by subject ] [ by author ]
Help: [ How to use the archives ] [ Search in the archives ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 6 January 2015 21:37:46 UTC