- From: Travis Leithead <travis.leithead@microsoft.com>
- Date: Wed, 15 Feb 2012 19:31:05 +0000
- To: Alex Russell <slightlyoff@google.com>, Marcos Caceres <w3c@marcosc.com>
- CC: Dominique Hazael-Massieux <dom@w3.org>, Anne van Kesteren <annevk@opera.com>, "public-script-coord@w3.org" <public-script-coord@w3.org>, Harald Alvestrand <harald@alvestrand.no>, "public-webrtc@w3.org" <public-webrtc@w3.org>
Sounds like the argument for consistency with previous "readyState" definitions loses to the use the new best-practice approach. To accommodate both, perhaps you should consider _not_ using the name readyState, and chose another similar-name that can apply the best-practice syntax.
Received on Wednesday, 15 February 2012 19:32:02 UTC