Re: [TreatNonCallableAsNull] alternative?

On Wednesday, 7 March 2012 at 11:47, Anne van Kesteren wrote:

> On Wed, 07 Mar 2012 12:24:31 +0100, Marcos Caceres <w3c@marcosc.com (mailto:w3c@marcosc.com)> wrote:
> > FWIW, I'm swinging towards agreeing with Cam hereā€¦ maybe DOM4 is  
> > actually the right place to define this in the manner that he states  
> > above. DOM4 does govern event handlers after all.
>  
> FYI, it doesn't. (There's a suggestion that maybe it should, but it's not  
> clear how to split from HTML.)

Is there a thread where that is being discussed? Maybe we can drag Hixie into this one?   


--  
Marcos Caceres
http://datadriven.com.au

Received on Wednesday, 7 March 2012 12:14:32 UTC