Re: CfC: publish Candidate Recommendation of Web IDL; deadline March 26 from Marcos Caceres on 2012-03-19 (public-script-coord@w3.org from January to March 2012)

From: Marcos Caceres <w3c@marcosc.com>
Date: Mon, 19 Mar 2012 11:24:23 +0000
To: public-script-coord <public-script-coord@w3.org>
Cc: public-webapps <public-webapps@w3.org>
Message-ID: <C4C580E2C82C4B75AAA18283707322D7@marcosc.com>

On Monday, 19 March 2012 at 10:58, Arthur Barstow wrote:

> Cameron has addressed the comments from Web IDL LC#3 [1] and the bug  
> list only contains two enhancement requests [2]. As such, this is a call  
> for consensus to publish a Candidate Recommendation of Web IDL using the  
> following ED as the basis:
>  
> http://dev.w3.org/2006/webapi/WebIDL/
>  
> This CfC satisfies: a) the group's requirement to "record the group's  
> decision to request advancement" to CR; and b) "General Requirements for  
> Advancement on the Recommendation Track" as defined in the Process Document:
>  
> http://www.w3.org/2005/10/Process-20051014/tr.html#transition-reqs
>  
> Positive response is preferred and encouraged and silence will be  
> considered as agreeing with the proposal. The deadline for comments is  
> March 26 and all comments should be sent to public-webapps at w3.org (http://w3.org).
>  

Would be nice if there was a test suite before progressing to CR… but it's not a blocker; just reduces the chance of bouncing back to LC and makes CR credible (hence the exit criteria could be to pass the test suite). Test suite would include grammar parsing, and implementation behaviour (though they would be tested as separate products).

Received on Monday, 19 March 2012 11:25:01 UTC