Re: [WebIDL] change argument names from identifiers

On Mon, 05 Mar 2012 04:04:44 +0100, Cameron McCormack <cam@mcc.id.au>  
wrote:
> However, it complicates parsing, is not obvious when you need to escape  
> and when you do not, and may look confusing to people reading the IDL.  
> I'm not at all sure that we should do this.

So should I write callback _callback and then refer to it as callback in  
prose? That is mainly why this came up.


-- 
Anne van Kesteren
http://annevankesteren.nl/

Received on Wednesday, 7 March 2012 15:57:19 UTC