W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-script-coord@w3.org > January to March 2012

Re: [WebIDL] change argument names from identifiers

From: Anne van Kesteren <annevk@opera.com>
Date: Wed, 07 Mar 2012 16:56:27 +0100
To: "Cameron McCormack" <cam@mcc.id.au>
Cc: public-script-coord@w3.org
Message-ID: <op.was48dts64w2qv@annevk-macbookpro.local>
On Mon, 05 Mar 2012 04:04:44 +0100, Cameron McCormack <cam@mcc.id.au>  
> However, it complicates parsing, is not obvious when you need to escape  
> and when you do not, and may look confusing to people reading the IDL.  
> I'm not at all sure that we should do this.

So should I write callback _callback and then refer to it as callback in  
prose? That is mainly why this came up.

Anne van Kesteren
Received on Wednesday, 7 March 2012 15:57:19 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 17 January 2020 17:14:05 UTC