Re: Getters establish own properties, or why is [NamedPropertiesObject] discouraged? from Cameron McCormack on 2012-02-25 (public-script-coord@w3.org from January to March 2012)

From: Cameron McCormack <cam@mcc.id.au>
Date: Sat, 25 Feb 2012 16:14:36 +1100
To: "Tab Atkins Jr." <jackalmage@gmail.com>
CC: public-script-coord@w3.org
Message-ID: <4F486E3C.8070508@mcc.id.au>

Cameron McCormack:
> I think there will be no need to monkeypatch the properties for
> Variables exposed on CSSStyleDeclaration objects, like there might be
> for CSS properties, so I think it would be OK to expose them as own
> properties even if CSS properties are accessor properties defined named
> properties and exposed on the prototype somehow.

s/defined/defined by/

Received on Saturday, 25 February 2012 05:15:08 UTC