W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-script-coord@w3.org > January to March 2012

[Bug 15986] Specify exactly how and when ECMAScript arguments are evaluated

From: <bugzilla@jessica.w3.org>
Date: Tue, 14 Feb 2012 19:34:48 +0000
To: public-script-coord@w3.org
Message-Id: <E1RxO9I-0008LC-9e@jessica.w3.org>

--- Comment #4 from Boris Zbarsky <bzbarsky@mit.edu> 2012-02-14 19:34:47 UTC ---
> This is currently the case per spec, right? 

I believe so, yes.

> What's an example of a place where we need overloading at all?

Good question.  Overloading predates union types...

> The second test-case from comment #0 indicates that Gecko doesn't follow the
> spec, doesn't it?

Well, since the spec postdates the relevant Gecko code, it couldn't exactly
"follow" it.  ;)

We're working on WebIDL-compliant binding code right now, though.  And again, I
think that for the one-overload case it's not clear that running overload
resolution as the spec does makes sense.

Configure bugmail: https://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.
Received on Tuesday, 14 February 2012 19:34:49 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 17 January 2020 17:14:05 UTC