Re: [TreatNonCallableAsNull] alternative? from Anne van Kesteren on 2012-03-07 (public-script-coord@w3.org from January to March 2012)

From: Anne van Kesteren <annevk@opera.com>
Date: Wed, 07 Mar 2012 12:47:03 +0100
To: "Cameron McCormack" <cam@mcc.id.au>, "Marcos Caceres" <w3c@marcosc.com>
Cc: public-script-coord@w3.org, "Boris Zbarsky" <bzbarsky@mit.edu>
Message-ID: <op.wastophw64w2qv@annevk-macbookpro.local>

On Wed, 07 Mar 2012 12:24:31 +0100, Marcos Caceres <w3c@marcosc.com> wrote:
> FWIW, I'm swinging towards agreeing with Cam here… maybe DOM4 is  
> actually the right place to define this in the manner that he states  
> above. DOM4 does govern event handlers after all.

FYI, it doesn't. (There's a suggestion that maybe it should, but it's not  
clear how to split from HTML.)


-- 
Anne van Kesteren
http://annevankesteren.nl/

Received on Wednesday, 7 March 2012 11:47:52 UTC