- From: <bugzilla@jessica.w3.org>
- Date: Sun, 18 Mar 2012 08:40:33 +0000
- To: public-script-coord@w3.org
https://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=16420 Summary: nullable or non-nullable sequence type == sequence type ? Product: WebAppsWG Version: unspecified Platform: All URL: http://dev.w3.org/2006/webapi/WebIDL/#idl-attributes OS/Version: All Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: P2 Component: WebIDL AssignedTo: cam@mcc.id.au ReportedBy: glenn@skynav.com QAContact: public-webapps-bugzilla@w3.org CC: mike@w3.org, public-script-coord@w3.org in 3.2.2 appears "The type of the attribute must not be a nullable or non-nullable sequence type, and it must not be a union type if one of its member types (or one of its member types’s member types, and so on) is a nullable or non-nullable sequence type." is it not redundant to say "nullable or non-nullable sequence type" when "sequence type" would suffice? or is not the case that "nullable or non-nullable" is tautologous? if it is not, then an example is sorely needed -- Configure bugmail: https://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.
Received on Sunday, 18 March 2012 08:40:35 UTC