- From: <bugzilla@jessica.w3.org>
- Date: Tue, 06 Mar 2012 23:28:33 +0000
- To: public-script-coord@w3.org
https://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=16075 --- Comment #10 from Cameron McCormack <cam@mcc.id.au> 2012-03-06 23:28:31 UTC --- I don't really like the pattern of ignoring a whole function call because one of the float/double arguments got a non-finite value. It's trickier still when the operation is declared with a return type other than void -- you need to define what gets returned from it. Maybe Aryeh's suggestion of mapping NaN/±Infinity to 0 would be OK, but I would like to see that we're all in favour of that change before making it. -- Configure bugmail: https://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.
Received on Tuesday, 6 March 2012 23:28:38 UTC