- From: Boris Zbarsky <bzbarsky@MIT.EDU>
- Date: Wed, 04 Jan 2012 03:16:53 -0500
- To: Ojan Vafai <ojan@chromium.org>
- CC: Cameron McCormack <cam@mcc.id.au>, "public-script-coord@w3.org" <public-script-coord@w3.org>, Travis Leithead <Travis.Leithead@microsoft.com>, Allen Wirfs-Brock <allen@wirfs-brock.com>, Ian Hickson <ian@hixie.ch>
On 1/4/12 3:10 AM, Ojan Vafai wrote: > Yeah, sorry, I'm not too familiar with the implementation or spec side > of this. That's fine, especially because at the moment the two have very little to do with each other. ;) > Can we move frames away from being own properties of the window > (i.e. move them onto some prototype)? That seems like the > "simplest" (in terms of how it works, not in terms of expressing it > in WebIDL) way of making var shadow their names. > > > Seems fine to me. I don't see any downsides. Maybe I just don't > understand the implications. :) Well, it's not describable in WebIDL as it stands. That's the main downside from a spec perspective. The other one is the usual "it's a behavior change, might break sites" thing. -Boris
Received on Wednesday, 4 January 2012 08:17:22 UTC