W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-script-coord@w3.org > January to March 2012

Re: New full Unicode for ES6 idea

From: Brendan Eich <brendan@mozilla.com>
Date: Fri, 02 Mar 2012 22:08:37 -0800
Message-ID: <4F51B565.5010503@mozilla.com>
To: Glenn Adams <glenn@skynav.com>, Erik Corry <erik.corry@gmail.com>
CC: "Phillips, Addison" <addison@lab126.com>, Mark Davis ☕ <mark@macchiato.com>, Cameron McCormack <cam@mcc.id.au>, "public-script-coord@w3.org" <public-script-coord@w3.org>, Anne van Kesteren <annevk@opera.com>, "mranney@voxer.com" <mranney@voxer.com>, es-discuss <es-discuss@mozilla.org>
Glenn Adams wrote:
> On Fri, Mar 2, 2012 at 2:13 AM, Erik Corry <erik.corry@gmail.com 
> <mailto:erik.corry@gmail.com>> wrote:
>     > level 3 is useful for higher level, language/locale sensitive text
>     No, the Unicode grapheme clustering algorithm is not locale or
>     language sensitive
>     http://unicode.org/reports/tr29/#Grapheme_Cluster_Boundaries
> one final comment: the Unicode algorithm is intended to define default 
> behavior only:
> "This specification defines /default/ mechanisms; more sophisticated 
> implementations can /and should/ tailor them for particular locales or 
> environments."
> it specifically states that implementations *should* provide 
> language/locale sensitive behavior;
> in actual text processing usage, one needs the language/locale 
> sensitive behavior in most cases, not a default behavior
Right, and Gecko, WebKit, and other web rendering engines obviously need 
to care about this. But they're invariably implemented mostly or wholly 
*not* in JS.

It's a bit ambitious for JS to have such facilities.

I agree with Erik that the day may come, but ES6 is being prototyped and 
spec'ed and we need to be done in 2012 to have the spec ready for 2013. 
We should not overreach.

Received on Saturday, 3 March 2012 06:09:09 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 17 January 2020 17:14:05 UTC