- From: Travis Leithead <travis.leithead@microsoft.com>
- Date: Mon, 19 Mar 2012 17:38:01 +0000
- To: Charles McCathieNevile <chaals@opera.com>, public-script-coord <public-script-coord@w3.org>, Marcos Caceres <w3c@marcosc.com>
- CC: public-webapps <public-webapps@w3.org>
>-----Original Message----- >From: Charles McCathieNevile [mailto:chaals@opera.com] > >On Mon, 19 Mar 2012 12:24:23 +0100, Marcos Caceres <w3c@marcosc.com> wrote: >> On Monday, 19 March 2012 at 10:58, Arthur Barstow wrote: >> >>> Cameron has addressed the comments from Web IDL LC#3 [1] and the bug >>> list only contains two enhancement requests [2]. As such, this is a call >>> for consensus to publish a Candidate Recommendation of Web IDL using the >>> following ED as the basis: >>> >>> http://dev.w3.org/2006/webapi/WebIDL/ >>> >>> This CfC satisfies: a) the group's requirement to "record the group's >>> decision to request advancement" to CR; and b) "General Requirements for >>> Advancement on the Recommendation Track" as defined in the Process >>> Document: >>> >>> http://www.w3.org/2005/10/Process-20051014/tr.html#transition-reqs >>> >>> Positive response is preferred and encouraged and silence will be >>> considered as agreeing with the proposal. The deadline for comments is >>> March 26 and all comments should be sent to public-webapps at w3.org >>> (http://w3.org). >>> >> Would be nice if there was a test suite before progressing to CR… > >Indeed. It would be nice to have a pony. I support the proposal. > I also support publication.
Received on Monday, 19 March 2012 17:39:16 UTC