- From: Ian Hickson <ian@hixie.ch>
- Date: Tue, 17 Jan 2012 22:13:53 +0000 (UTC)
- To: Boris Zbarsky <bzbarsky@MIT.EDU>
- cc: "Mark S. Miller" <erights@google.com>, Allen Wirfs-Brock <allen@wirfs-brock.com>, Luke Hoban <lukeh@microsoft.com>, "es5-discuss@mozilla.org" <es5-discuss@mozilla.org>, public-script-coord@w3.org
On Fri, 8 Jul 2011, Boris Zbarsky wrote: > > > > This might be too strong a requirement, though. I'm happy to scope it > > somewhat if that would make more sense. Scoping it to the Window > > objects using the same event loop probably makes the most sense; would > > that be better? > > I'm not sure it would be enough better. As the spec is currently > phrased, that would mean that a setTimeout(0) call on a background-tab > window would delay a later setTimeout(0) call on a foreground window > that is on the same event loop. That somewhat defeats the point of > throttling background windows. Fair enough. I've scoped it to the same Window. -- Ian Hickson U+1047E )\._.,--....,'``. fL http://ln.hixie.ch/ U+263A /, _.. \ _\ ;`._ ,. Things that are impossible just take longer. `._.-(,_..'--(,_..'`-.;.'
Received on Tuesday, 17 January 2012 22:14:16 UTC