- From: Cameron McCormack <cam@mcc.id.au>
- Date: Thu, 05 Jan 2012 12:03:08 +1100
- To: Dominique Hazael-Massieux <dom@w3.org>
- CC: public-script-coord@w3.org
Dominique Hazael-Massieux: > Actually, looking at it again, it still doesn't allow for nested union > types, since UnionMemberType doesn't reference UnionType. I think adding > | UnionType to UnionMemberType should do. Yes, you're right. I've changed the grammar in the spec now. http://dev.w3.org/cvsweb/2006/webapi/WebIDL/Overview.xml.diff?r1=1.446;r2=1.447;f=h
Received on Thursday, 5 January 2012 01:06:09 UTC