Dominique Hazael-Massieux: > Actually, looking at it again, it still doesn't allow for nested union > types, since UnionMemberType doesn't reference UnionType. I think adding > | UnionType to UnionMemberType should do. Yes, you're right. I've changed the grammar in the spec now. http://dev.w3.org/cvsweb/2006/webapi/WebIDL/Overview.xml.diff?r1=1.446;r2=1.447;f=hReceived on Thursday, 5 January 2012 01:06:09 UTC
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 6 January 2015 21:37:46 UTC