W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-script-coord@w3.org > January to March 2012

Re: namegetter on prototype? (was Re: [cssom] CSSStyleDeclaration)

From: Cameron McCormack <cam@mcc.id.au>
Date: Fri, 24 Feb 2012 12:42:24 +1100
Message-ID: <4F46EB00.9020305@mcc.id.au>
To: Glenn Adams <glenn@skynav.com>
CC: W3C Script Coordination <public-script-coord@w3.org>, W3C Style <www-style@w3.org>

Glenn Adams:
> Thread [1] raises a question about specifying a namegetter on prototype vs
> object. This seems like a good topic to coordinate.
>
> [1] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2012Feb/1194.html

Thanks, I've replied to Tab's mail on public-script-coord.  Please 
follow up there.

Received on Friday, 24 February 2012 01:43:07 UTC

This message: [ Message body ]
Next message: bugzilla@jessica.w3.org: "[Bug 16098] New: callback interfaces with constants should have no interface prototype object"
Previous message: Cameron McCormack: "Re: Getters establish own properties, or why is [NamedPropertiesObject] discouraged?"
In reply to: Glenn Adams: "namegetter on prototype? (was Re: [cssom] CSSStyleDeclaration)"

Mail actions: [ respond to this message ] [ mail a new topic ]
Contemporary messages sorted: [ by date ] [ by thread ] [ by subject ] [ by author ]
Help: [ How to use the archives ] [ Search in the archives ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 6 January 2015 21:37:46 UTC