- From: Charles McCathieNevile <chaals@opera.com>
- Date: Mon, 19 Mar 2012 12:52:57 +0100
- To: public-script-coord <public-script-coord@w3.org>, "Marcos Caceres" <w3c@marcosc.com>
- Cc: public-webapps <public-webapps@w3.org>
On Mon, 19 Mar 2012 12:24:23 +0100, Marcos Caceres <w3c@marcosc.com> wrote:
> On Monday, 19 March 2012 at 10:58, Arthur Barstow wrote:
>
>> Cameron has addressed the comments from Web IDL LC#3 [1] and the bug
>> list only contains two enhancement requests [2]. As such, this is a call
>> for consensus to publish a Candidate Recommendation of Web IDL using the
>> following ED as the basis:
>>
>> http://dev.w3.org/2006/webapi/WebIDL/
>>
>> This CfC satisfies: a) the group's requirement to "record the group's
>> decision to request advancement" to CR; and b) "General Requirements for
>> Advancement on the Recommendation Track" as defined in the Process
>> Document:
>>
>> http://www.w3.org/2005/10/Process-20051014/tr.html#transition-reqs
>>
>> Positive response is preferred and encouraged and silence will be
>> considered as agreeing with the proposal. The deadline for comments is
>> March 26 and all comments should be sent to public-webapps at w3.org
>> (http://w3.org).
>>
> Would be nice if there was a test suite before progressing to CR…
Indeed. It would be nice to have a pony. I support the proposal.
cheers
Chaals
--
Charles 'chaals' McCathieNevile Opera Software, Standards Group
je parle français -- hablo español -- jeg kan litt norsk
http://my.opera.com/chaals Try Opera: http://www.opera.com
Received on Monday, 19 March 2012 11:53:29 UTC