W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-script-coord@w3.org > January to March 2012

Re: New full Unicode for ES6 idea

From: Mark S. Miller <erights@google.com>
Date: Sun, 19 Feb 2012 03:12:30 -0800
Message-ID: <CABHxS9i3ZB1TT7prOMAdi8Sexpg9HTASYfo6v7aJOu+Q9DoVWw@mail.gmail.com>
To: Brendan Eich <brendan@mozilla.com>
Cc: es-discuss <es-discuss@mozilla.org>, "public-script-coord@w3.org" <public-script-coord@w3.org>, mranney@voxer.com
On Sun, Feb 19, 2012 at 12:33 AM, Brendan Eich <brendan@mozilla.com> wrote:

> Why the global object? Because for many VMs, each global has its own heap
> or sub-heap ("compartment"), and all references outside that heap are to
> local proxies that copy from, or in the case of immutable data, reference
> the remote heap.


Is this true for same origin iframes? I have always assumed that mixing
heaps between same origin iframes results in unmediated direct
object-to-object access. If these are already mediated, what was the issue
that drove us to that?

Received on Sunday, 19 February 2012 11:12:59 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 17 January 2020 17:14:05 UTC