[FLD+BLD] Diagrams
[RIF] draft minutes for 29 April 2008 telecon
DTB status (on today's agenda)
- xpath namespace (was Re: DTB status (on today's agenda))
- Re: DTB status (on today's agenda)
- Re: DTB status (on today's agenda)
- Re: DTB status (on today's agenda)
- Re: DTB status (on today's agenda)
- Re: DTB status (on today's agenda)
[ISSUE-51] organising a RIF document VS attaching metadata to items?
[ISSUE-51] Formulae wrappers (2/2: required or optional)
[ISSUE-51] Formulae wrappers (1/2: abstract and concrete)
- Re: [ISSUE-51] Formulae wrappers (1/2: abstract and concrete)
- Re: [ISSUE-51] Formulae wrappers (1/2: abstract and concrete)
data type extenibility (ISSUE-34)
Re: ISSUE-51: Another possible compromise for metadata syntax --> org vs metadata
[Admin] Agenda for RIF telecon April 29
The problem with nested rulesets (aka groups)
[Admin] draft Minutes from April 22, 2008 telecon
importing RDF and OWL
imports "entailment regimes"
where to hang the metadata?
- Re: where to hang the metadata?
- RE: where to hang the metadata?
- Re: where to hang the metadata? (compromise proposal)
- ISSUE-51: Another possible compromise for metadata syntax
- RE: where to hang the metadata?
- Re: where to hang the metadata?
- Metadata for all and PS for metadata (Was Re: where to hang the metadata?)
- Re: where to hang the metadata?
- Re: where to hang the metadata?
- Re: where to hang the metadata?
- Re: where to hang the metadata?
- Re: where to hang the metadata?
- Re: where to hang the metadata?
- Re: where to hang the metadata?
- Re: where to hang the metadata?
4TH REASONING WEB SUMMER SCHOOL (RW 2008): Call for participation (online applications open now!)
ISSUE-58 (COMMENTS): Embedded Comments in BLD [BLD]
ISSUE-59 (SURVIVABILITY): Survivability of metadata and comments [BLD]
[Admin] Agenda for RIF telecon April 21
Galway registration/regrets survey (RIF F2F10)
Last call issues
ISSUE-57 (Syntax Extensibility): Should the BLD XML syntax have an extensibility mechanism [CP] [BLD]
ISSUE-56 (Shortcuts): Should the presentation syntax have a simplied form in addition to the verbose form [CP] [BLD]
ISSUE-55 (STRIPING): Should the XML syntax be fully striped [CP] [Technical Design (multiple dialects/documents)]
ISSUE-54 (DL-Safeness): What level of safeness in BLD/OWL-Dl combinations is required. [OWL/RDF Compatibility]
ISSUE-53: Annotation Properties in OWL [CP] [OWL/RDF Compatibility]
ISSUE-52 (Entailment Regimes): Specification of OWL & RDF entailment regimes [CP] [OWL/RDF Compatibility]
Minutes from April 15, 2008, telecon
[DTB] ACTIONs 428 and 292 completed
- Re: [DTB] ACTIONs 428 and 292 completed
- Re: [DTB] ACTIONs 428 and 292 completed
- Re: [DTB] ACTIONs 428 and 292 completed
- Re: [DTB] ACTIONs 428 and 292 completed
- CURIE proposal ... (was: Re: [DTB] ACTIONs 428 and 292 completed)
- Re: CURIE proposal ... (was: Re: [DTB] ACTIONs 428 and 292 completed)
- Re: CURIE proposal ... (was: Re: [DTB] ACTIONs 428 and 292 completed)
- Re: CURIE proposal ... (was: Re: [DTB] ACTIONs 428 and 292 completed)
- Re: CURIE proposal ... (was: Re: [DTB] ACTIONs 428 and 292 completed)
- Re: CURIE proposal ... (was: Re: [DTB] ACTIONs 428 and 292 completed)
- Re: CURIE proposal ...
- Re: CURIE proposal ...
- Re: CURIE proposal ...
- Re: CURIE proposal ...
- Re: CURIE proposal ...
- Re: CURIE proposal ...
- Re: CURIE proposal ... (was: Re: [DTB] ACTIONs 428 and 292 completed)
- Re: CURIE proposal ...
- Re: CURIE proposal ...
- Re: CURIE proposal ...
- Re: CURIE proposal ... (was: Re: [DTB] ACTIONs 428 and 292 completed)
- Re: CURIE proposal ...
- Re: CURIE proposal ...
- CURIE proposal ... (was: Re: [DTB] ACTIONs 428 and 292 completed)
- Re: CURIE proposal ...
- Re: CURIE proposal ...
- Re: [DTB] ACTIONs 428 and 292 completed
- Re: CURIE proposal ...
- Re: CURIE proposal ...
- Re: CURIE proposal ...
- Re: [DTB] ACTIONs 428 and 292 completed
- Re: CURIE proposal ...
- Re: CURIE proposal ...
- Re: CURIE proposal ...
- Re: CURIE proposal ...
- Re: CURIE proposal ...
- Re: CURIE proposal ...
- Re: CURIE proposal ...
- Re: CURIE proposal ...
- Re: CURIE proposal ...
publications are done
ISSUE-51: MetaData Syntax and Rule Identification [Technical Design (multiple dialects/documents)]
issue-49 (xml naming) and BLD
new snapshots
Review of RIF-FLD, version of April 14, 2008
[BLD] comments on BLD draft
review of OWL+RDF
DTB intermediate commit - still working on it
Re: RIF BLD update
[FLD] Comments on draft dated April 7
- Re: [FLD] Comments on draft dated April 7
- Re: [FLD] Comments on draft dated April 7
- Re: [FLD] Comments on draft dated April 7
[Admin] Agenda for RIF telecon April 15
new snapshots
review of RIF-FLD, April 10
Re: [RIF] comments on FLD, April 10 version
[RIF] comments on FLD, April 10 version
semantics of local constants - followup
[BLD] review of snapshot version http://www.w3.org/2005/rules/wg/draft/ED-rif-bld-20080410/
- RE: [BLD] review of snapshot version http://www.w3.org/2005/rules/wg/draft/ED-rif-bld-20080410/
- Re: [BLD] review of snapshot version http://www.w3.org/2005/rules/wg/draft/ED-rif-bld-20080410/