- From: Michael Kifer <kifer@cs.sunysb.edu>
- Date: Mon, 28 Apr 2008 13:20:47 -0400
- To: Christian de Sainte Marie <csma@ilog.fr>
- Cc: Sandro Hawke <sandro@w3.org>, "Boley, Harold" <Harold.Boley@nrc-cnrc.gc.ca>, public-rif-wg@w3.org
> Michael Kifer wrote: > > > > The proposal in question was to bloat BLD itself. > > You lost me: what I was talking about was allowing metadata on all > objects (elements with a capitalised tag), without necessarily > specifying a PS for all classes in BLD (e.g. specifying a PS only for > metadata on Groups, and Rules if Rules there be etc). > > What would be the arguments against that (not saying there aren't: I am > just trying to clarify the issue before the discussion)? I explained that in a message to Sandro: Jos made a correct observation that the only formal spec of the language is the presentation syntax. So, XML must be defined by a precise mapping from the presentation syntax (which is how it is done now). --michael > Christian > >
Received on Monday, 28 April 2008 17:22:04 UTC