> The Rule wrapper is unacceptable from the FLD point of view. > I am glad that there is FLD to keep us honest :-) To me it makes a lot of sense to call it "Rule", because we are creating a rule interchange format (to be honest :-)). Things that are not rules (e.g., queries, constraints) can be called something else in FLD. That said, I'm not married to the label "Rule". It could also be called something like "Formula". > And this extra wrapper is just bloat that gives nothing. > > All this mess indicates to me that the only good solution is our original > proposal to use Group only. I actually never understood why we would need groups? To me the original notion we had in the working group, of a ruleset containing a bunch of rules, seems to be the best solution. Best, Jos -- Jos de Bruijn debruijn@inf.unibz.it +390471016224 http://www.debruijn.net/ ---------------------------------------------- An expert is a person who has made all the mistakes that can be made in a very narrow field. - Niels Bohr
Received on Monday, 28 April 2008 17:14:36 UTC