review of OWL+RDF

Below is my review of [1].  I don't see any reason to delay  
publication.  Most of my comments are editorial.

	Mike

[1] http://www.w3.org/2005/rules/wg/draft/ED-rif-rdf-owl-20080414/


   Section 1

     Web Ontology Language OWL => OWL Web Ontology Language

     of the document => of this document

     one that does[;] it is an open issue

     #Appendix => Appendix

   Section 2

     how [a] RIF ruleset interacts

     in a RIF-RDF combinations => in a RIF-RDF combination or in
     RIF-RDF combinations

     is a some x => is some x

     is not an integer; it is => is not an integer, i.e. it is

     This remainder => The remainder

   Section 2.1

     RIF-RDF-combinations => RIF-RDF combinations (inconsistent usage
     in document)

   Section 2.2.1.1

     What are Var and Const?

   Section 3

     Should [#RDF_Compatibility] be a link?

     variables and function terms and frame formulas => variables,
     function terms, and frame formulas

     OWL 1.1 => OWL 2

   Section 3.1.1

     define safeness => defining safeness

   Section 3.2

     #Semantics => Semantics

     RIF-OWL Full and => RIF-OWL-Full-

   Section 3.2.2.2

     as well as [on] the set of resources

     member sof => members of

     similar[ly] for constants denoting data values

   Section 3.2.2.3

     OWL 1.1 => OWL 2 (twice)

   Section 4.1

     RIF Basic Logic Dialect[,]

     drop "World Wide Web Consortium," for consistency with other  
references

   Section 4.2

     Marie (Editors) => Marie, Editor

     Patranjan (Editors) => Patranjan, Editors

   Section 5.1.4

     Shouldn't wellxml be interpreted as the set of well-formed XML
     values or be named xml?

   Section 5.1.7

     graphs T => graph T

     because, in case => because when

   Section 5.2.3.2

     #Embedding_Symbols => Embedding_Symbols