Re: review of OWL+RDF

Mike,

Thanks a lot for the detailed comments. I implemented all your 
suggestions except for:

>   Section 5.1.4
> 
>     Shouldn't wellxml be interpreted as the set of well-formed XML
>     values or be named xml?

I meant here XML values as defined in the RDF-Concepts document.  I 
added an explicit link.


Best, Jos


-- 
Jos de Bruijn            debruijn@inf.unibz.it
+390471016224         http://www.debruijn.net/
----------------------------------------------
Doubt is not a pleasant condition, but
certainty is absurd.
   - Voltaire