- From: Axel Polleres <axel.polleres@deri.org>
- Date: Tue, 29 Apr 2008 22:04:14 +0100
- To: Michael Kifer <kifer@cs.sunysb.edu>
- CC: "Public-Rif-Wg (E-mail)" <public-rif-wg@w3.org>
Michael Kifer wrote: >> Dear all, >> >> since DTB status is on the agenda today, I basically want to clarify in >> the call today the following issues. I was anyway a bit occupied with >> other things, but basically, I am still stuck, as long as these issues >> are open, because any switch on them would mean unnecessary additional >> work on editing over the whole document (as opposed doing it in one go >> when they are clarified). >> >> ============================================================================== >> >> >> 1) As for CURIEs, is [1] a proposal which woulc achieve a majority? >> I would like it. I postponed further editing before the CURIE issues is >> solved or before at least it was discussed in the Telconf., since I >> don't want to change everything back again, when we decide something. >> >> I suggest to >> >> PROPOSE: Adopt the CURIE proposals of [1] for RIF's presentation syntax. >> >> [1] Sandro's final CURIE proposal: >> http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-rif-wg/2008Apr/0134.html > > As discussed, this still has the old problems that interpretation of the > macro : depends on the context and is too complex. Why not use a simple > concatenation macro and be done with it? Well, don't think this is a problem if "marcos" ie. prefixes are not expanded within quotes and angle brackets. Why ist is a problem if quotes or angle brackets escape the macro expansion? Otherwise, you can get ambiguities. Axel -- Dr. Axel Polleres, Digital Enterprise Research Institute (DERI) email: axel.polleres@deri.org url: http://www.polleres.net/ rdfs:Resource owl:differentFrom xsd:anyURI .
Received on Tuesday, 29 April 2008 21:04:57 UTC