Wednesday, 30 April 2008
- Re: DTB status (on today's agenda)
- [FLD+BLD] Diagrams
- Re: DTB status (on today's agenda)
- Re: DTB status (on today's agenda)
- Re: DTB status (on today's agenda)
- Re: DTB status (on today's agenda)
- Re: DTB status (on today's agenda)
Tuesday, 29 April 2008
- Re: DTB status (on today's agenda)
- [RIF] draft minutes for 29 April 2008 telecon
- Re: DTB status (on today's agenda)
- Re: DTB status (on today's agenda)
- Re: xpath namespace (was Re: DTB status (on today's agenda))
- xpath namespace (was Re: DTB status (on today's agenda))
- DTB status (on today's agenda)
- RE: [ISSUE-51] Formulae wrappers (1/2: abstract and concrete) -- small metadata handle
- Re: [ISSUE-51] Formulae wrappers (1/2: abstract and concrete)
- [ISSUE-51] organising a RIF document VS attaching metadata to items?
- Re: [ISSUE-51] Formulae wrappers (1/2: abstract and concrete)
- Re: [ISSUE-51] Formulae wrappers (1/2: abstract and concrete)
- Re: [ISSUE-51] Formulae wrappers (2/2: required or optional)
- [ISSUE-51] Formulae wrappers (2/2: required or optional)
- [ISSUE-51] Formulae wrappers (1/2: abstract and concrete)
- data type extenibility (ISSUE-34)
Monday, 28 April 2008
- Re: ISSUE-51: Another possible compromise for metadata syntax
- Re: where to hang the metadata?
- Re: where to hang the metadata?
- Re: where to hang the metadata?
- Re: ISSUE-51: Another possible compromise for metadata syntax --> org vs metadata
- Re: ISSUE-51: Another possible compromise for metadata syntax
- Re: Last call issues
- Re: ISSUE-51: Another possible compromise for metadata syntax
- Re: ISSUE-51: Another possible compromise for metadata syntax --> org vs metadata
- Re: Metadata for all and PS for metadata (Was Re: where to hang the metadata?)
- Re: where to hang the metadata?
- Re: Metadata for all and PS for metadata (Was Re: where to hang the metadata?)
- Re: where to hang the metadata?
- Re: ISSUE-51: Another possible compromise for metadata syntax
- Re: where to hang the metadata?
- Re: Metadata for all and PS for metadata (Was Re: where to hang the metadata?)
- RE: ISSUE-51: Another possible compromise for metadata syntax --> org vs metadata
- Re: where to hang the metadata?
- Re: where to hang the metadata?
- Re: Metadata for all and PS for metadata (Was Re: where to hang the metadata?)
- Re: where to hang the metadata?
- Re: where to hang the metadata?
- Re: Metadata for all and PS for metadata (Was Re: where to hang the metadata?)
- Re: where to hang the metadata?
- Re: where to hang the metadata?
- Re: where to hang the metadata?
- Re: Metadata for all and PS for metadata (Was Re: where to hang the metadata?)
- Re: where to hang the metadata?
- Metadata for all and PS for metadata (Was Re: where to hang the metadata?)
- [Admin] Agenda for RIF telecon April 29
- Re: ISSUE-51: Another possible compromise for metadata syntax
- Re: ISSUE-51: Another possible compromise for metadata syntax
- Re: where to hang the metadata?
- RE: where to hang the metadata?
Sunday, 27 April 2008
Friday, 25 April 2008
- RE: The problem with nested rulesets (aka groups)
- ISSUE-51: Another possible compromise for metadata syntax
- Re: where to hang the metadata? (compromise proposal)
- The problem with nested rulesets (aka groups)
Thursday, 24 April 2008
- [Admin] draft Minutes from April 22, 2008 telecon
- importing RDF and OWL
- PRD thoughts <--: where to hang the metadata?
- RE: where to hang the metadata?
Wednesday, 23 April 2008
Tuesday, 22 April 2008
- Re: CURIE proposal ...
- Re: CURIE proposal ...
- Re: CURIE proposal ...
- Re: CURIE proposal ...
- imports "entailment regimes"
- where to hang the metadata?
- Re: CURIE proposal ...
- Re: CURIE proposal ...
- Re: CURIE proposal ...
- Re: CURIE proposal ...
- Re: CURIE proposal ...
- Re: CURIE proposal ...
- Re: CURIE proposal ...
- Re: CURIE proposal ...
- Re: CURIE proposal ...
- Re: CURIE proposal ...
- Re: CURIE proposal ...
- Re: CURIE proposal ...
- Re: CURIE proposal ...
- Re: CURIE proposal ...
- Re: CURIE proposal ...
- 4TH REASONING WEB SUMMER SCHOOL (RW 2008): Call for participation (online applications open now!)
- Re: CURIE proposal ...
- Re: CURIE proposal ...
- Re: CURIE proposal ...
- Re: CURIE proposal ...
- Re: CURIE proposal ...
- Re: CURIE proposal ...
- Re: CURIE proposal ...
- Re: CURIE proposal ...
- Re: CURIE proposal ... (was: Re: [DTB] ACTIONs 428 and 292 completed)
- Re: CURIE proposal ...
- Re: CURIE proposal ... (was: Re: [DTB] ACTIONs 428 and 292 completed)
- Re: CURIE proposal ... (was: Re: [DTB] ACTIONs 428 and 292 completed)
- ISSUE-58 (COMMENTS): Embedded Comments in BLD [BLD]
- ISSUE-59 (SURVIVABILITY): Survivability of metadata and comments [BLD]
- [Admin] Agenda for RIF telecon April 21
- Re: CURIE proposal ... (was: Re: [DTB] ACTIONs 428 and 292 completed)
- Re: CURIE proposal ... (was: Re: [DTB] ACTIONs 428 and 292 completed)
- Galway registration/regrets survey (RIF F2F10)
Monday, 21 April 2008
Sunday, 20 April 2008
- Last call issues
- ISSUE-57 (Syntax Extensibility): Should the BLD XML syntax have an extensibility mechanism [CP] [BLD]
- ISSUE-56 (Shortcuts): Should the presentation syntax have a simplied form in addition to the verbose form [CP] [BLD]
- ISSUE-55 (STRIPING): Should the XML syntax be fully striped [CP] [Technical Design (multiple dialects/documents)]
- ISSUE-54 (DL-Safeness): What level of safeness in BLD/OWL-Dl combinations is required. [OWL/RDF Compatibility]
- ISSUE-53: Annotation Properties in OWL [CP] [OWL/RDF Compatibility]
- ISSUE-52 (Entailment Regimes): Specification of OWL & RDF entailment regimes [CP] [OWL/RDF Compatibility]
Friday, 18 April 2008
Thursday, 17 April 2008
- Re: [DTB] ACTIONs 428 and 292 completed
- Re: [DTB] ACTIONs 428 and 292 completed
- Re: [DTB] ACTIONs 428 and 292 completed
- Re: Review of RIF-FLD, version of April 14, 2008
- Re: [DTB] ACTIONs 428 and 292 completed
- Re: [DTB] ACTIONs 428 and 292 completed
Wednesday, 16 April 2008
Tuesday, 15 April 2008
- [DTB] ACTIONs 428 and 292 completed
- Re: [BLD] comments on BLD draft
- Re: publications are done
- publications are done
- Re: [BLD] comments on BLD draft
- Re: [BLD] comments on BLD draft
- Re: [FLD] Comments on draft dated April 7
- ISSUE-51: MetaData Syntax and Rule Identification [Technical Design (multiple dialects/documents)]
- Re: issue-49 (xml naming) and BLD
- Re: issue-49 (xml naming) and BLD
- Re: [BLD] comments on BLD draft
- issue-49 (xml naming) and BLD
- new snapshots
- RE: [BLD] comments on BLD draft
- Re: [FLD] Comments on draft dated April 7
- Review of RIF-FLD, version of April 14, 2008
- [BLD] comments on BLD draft
- Re: review of OWL+RDF
- Re: [Admin] Agenda for RIF telecon April 15
- review of OWL+RDF
- DTB intermediate commit - still working on it
- Re: RIF BLD update
Monday, 14 April 2008
- Re: [FLD] Comments on draft dated April 7
- [FLD] Comments on draft dated April 7
- Re: review of RIF-FLD, April 10
- RE: review of RIF-FLD, April 10
- [Admin] Agenda for RIF telecon April 15
- new snapshots
- review of RIF-FLD, April 10
- Re: [RIF] comments on FLD, April 10 version
- [RIF] comments on FLD, April 10 version
Saturday, 12 April 2008
- Re: [BLD] review of snapshot version http://www.w3.org/2005/rules/wg/draft/ED-rif-bld-20080410/
- semantics of local constants - followup
- RE: [BLD] review of snapshot version http://www.w3.org/2005/rules/wg/draft/ED-rif-bld-20080410/
- [BLD] review of snapshot version http://www.w3.org/2005/rules/wg/draft/ED-rif-bld-20080410/
- semantics of local constants - followup
- Re: [RIF] comments on BLD, April 10 version
- Re: [RIF] comments on BLD, April 10 version
Friday, 11 April 2008
- Re: semantics of local constants [was: Re: imports + metadata]
- ISSUE-50: Metadata [BLD]
- [RIF] comments on BLD, April 10 version
- BLD changes from Apr 7 to Apr 10
- Re: discussion of metadata proposals
- Re: imports + metadata
- semantics of local constants [was: Re: imports + metadata]
Thursday, 10 April 2008
- w3c publication requirements
- RIF Publications -- snapshots & review deadline
- Re: imports + metadata
- RE: imports + metadata
- Re: imports + metadata
- [Fwd: Re: Questions about BLD conditions and rule syntax and XML translation]
Wednesday, 9 April 2008
Tuesday, 8 April 2008
- Publication plan- REVIEWERS NEEDED!
- document publication mechanics - for editors
- draft minutes of RIF telecon, April 8
- [Admin] Agenda for RIF telecon April 8 (revised)
- quick comments on BLD intro
- THE FOURTH REASONING WEB SUMMER SCHOOL (RW 2008): Call for participation
- [Asmin] Agenda for RIF telecon April 8
Monday, 7 April 2008
- FLD Snapshow ready (was Re: AGENDA and BLD Snapshot)
- Re: AGENDA and BLD Snapshot
- Re: AGENDA and BLD Snapshot
- AGENDA and BLD Snapshot
- ACTION-440, Add some test cases to the WIKI page about test cases
Saturday, 5 April 2008
Friday, 4 April 2008
Thursday, 3 April 2008
Wednesday, 2 April 2008
- Re: import qus <-- RE: imports + metadata
- Re: discussion of metadata proposals
- discussion of metadata proposals
- Re: import qus <-- RE: imports + metadata
- Re: Rulesets
- Rulesets
- RE: the <meta> tag
Tuesday, 1 April 2008
- import qus <-- RE: imports + metadata
- Re: imports + metadata
- the <meta> tag
- modules in RIF
- imports + metadata
- Re: ATTENTION: Revisiting a resolution
- Re: ATTENTION: Revisiting a resolution
- Re: ACTION-430, Move specialization sections to appendices
- ATTENTION: Revisiting a resolution
- Re: ACTION-430, Move specialization sections to appendices