- From: Christian de Sainte Marie <csma@ilog.fr>
- Date: Mon, 28 Apr 2008 19:49:49 +0200
- To: Paul Vincent <pvincent@tibco.com>
- CC: public-rif-wg@w3.org
Received on Monday, 28 April 2008 17:49:55 UTC
Paul Vincent wrote: > Christian - thanks for the diagrams - would be good if you assigned > ownership to each one so we can relate the discussion vs the model :) What do you mean "assigned ownership to each one"? You mean, who defends which position? Well, as I said: - diagram 1 is BLD as in WD2 (so, Horald and Michael; endorsed by us all as a WG as far as WD2 is concerned); - diagram 2 is currently proposed in BLD (so, I assume, representative of Harold and Michael's position); - diagram 3 is ChrisW's proposal for BLD (I realise that the diagram " that I sent previously contained an error: here is teh corrected diagram) - and diagram 4 is mine (which is like Chris's, with an ambiguity corrected: the ambiguity is that in Chris's proposal, there are two different ways to serialize the same set of RULEs, as is visible in the attached Diagram 3 - and as was not the case in the erroneous one I sent previously). I assume that ChrisW/my proposal are supported by Sandro as well, as we had discussed them before. (I will read the Org VS Metadata part of your message tomorrow :-) Christian
Received on Monday, 28 April 2008 17:49:55 UTC