- From: Axel Polleres <axel.polleres@deri.org>
- Date: Tue, 22 Apr 2008 16:18:47 +0100
- To: Michael Kifer <kifer@cs.sunysb.edu>
- CC: Bijan Parsia <bparsia@cs.man.ac.uk>, Sandro Hawke <sandro@w3.org>, Chris Welty <cawelty@gmail.com>, "Public-Rif-Wg (E-mail)" <public-rif-wg@w3.org>
Michael Kifer wrote: >> My point is that a halfway stop is no good. Either have a fully >> specced Presentation Syntax or use the XML directly. > > Yeah! Write semantics using XML and then come back. obviously a no go... > Or just look at XML versions of the examples vs. the resentation syntax > examples and tell me which ones you understand. I believe that Axels > comment that XML is as easy as the presentation syntax (in RIF) Actually, I was arguing the other way around, i.e. the the presentation syntax is getting almost as bad as the XML synax in some places which is why I argued for simplifications in first place. I am all for a (readable) presentation syntax ;-) Axel > was made > when he was not fully awake or in the heat of an argument. > > > --michael -- Dr. Axel Polleres, Digital Enterprise Research Institute (DERI) email: axel.polleres@deri.org url: http://www.polleres.net/ rdfs:Resource owl:differentFrom xsd:anyURI .
Received on Tuesday, 22 April 2008 15:19:38 UTC