review of RDF Concepts
Minutes for 28 November
Late
Review of rdf11-concepts ED
[ALL] agenda 28 Nov telecon
Agenda: JSON-LD Telecon - Tuesday, November 27th 2012
Review of JSON-LD API by WebIDL/JavaScript API expert
JSON-LD Telecon Minutes for 2012-11-20
Possible test case for turtle?
A different take on b-scopes (ISSUE-107)
1.5 RDF and Change Over Time
RDF Concepts draft ready; overview of open issues
Use http://www.w3.org/ns/json-ld#context instead of describedby link relation
regrets for the telecon
Agenda: JSON-LD Telecon - Tuesday, November 20th 2012
JSON-LD Telecon Minutes for 2012-11-13
Rollup EARL report for Turtle
[All] Agenda for 21 Nov
- Re: [All] Agenda for 21 Nov
- Re: [All] Agenda for 21 Nov
- Re: [All] Agenda for 21 Nov
- Re: [All] Agenda for 21 Nov
Fwd: Turtle tests : Case-sensitivity of base and prefix directives
Turtle test suite -- actions completed
B-scopes
Intent to close ISSUE-166
Agenda: JSON-LD Telecon - Tuesday, November 13th 2012
- RE: Agenda: JSON-LD Telecon - Tuesday, November 13th 2012
- Re: Agenda: JSON-LD Telecon - Tuesday, November 13th 2012
No Telecon Wednesday due to ISWC
Re: RDF-ISSUE-109 (ill-typed-so-what): What's the consequence of a literal being ill-typed? [RDF Concepts]
- Re: RDF-ISSUE-109 (ill-typed-so-what): What's the consequence of a literal being ill-typed? [RDF Concepts]
- Re: RDF-ISSUE-109 (ill-typed-so-what): What's the consequence of a literal being ill-typed? [RDF Concepts]
- Re: RDF-ISSUE-109 (ill-typed-so-what): What's the consequence of a literal being ill-typed? [RDF Concepts]
- Re: RDF-ISSUE-109 (ill-typed-so-what): What's the consequence of a literal being ill-typed? [RDF Concepts]
- Re: RDF-ISSUE-109 (ill-typed-so-what): What's the consequence of a literal being ill-typed? [RDF Concepts]
- Re: RDF-ISSUE-109 (ill-typed-so-what): What's the consequence of a literal being ill-typed? [RDF Concepts]
Turtle - Collections Example sanity check
Where is the Turtle editor's draft?
OWL2/RIF's rdf:PlainLiteral proposed edited rec
Intent to close issues 125 and 192
RDF-ISSUE-111 (dataset-operations): Should RDF Concepts define any operations on RDF datasets? [RDF Concepts]
[Concepts] Editorial changes to Blank Nodes (ISSUE-107)
- Re: [Concepts] Editorial changes to Blank Nodes (ISSUE-107)
- Re: [Concepts] Editorial changes to Blank Nodes (ISSUE-107)
- Re: [Concepts] Editorial changes to Blank Nodes (ISSUE-107)
- Re: [Concepts] Editorial changes to Blank Nodes (ISSUE-107)
[Concepts] Proposing some informative Notes for deletion
RDF-ISSUE-110 (g-box): A proper term for the concept formerly known as ??g-box??? [RDF Concepts]
- Re: RDF-ISSUE-110 (g-box): A proper term for the concept formerly known as “g-box”? [RDF Concepts]
- Re: RDF-ISSUE-110 (g-box): A proper term for the concept formerly known as “g-box”? [RDF Concepts]
- Re: RDF-ISSUE-110 (g-box): A proper term for the concept formerly known as “g-box”? [RDF Concepts]
- Re: RDF-ISSUE-110 (g-box): A proper term for the concept formerly known as “g-box”? [RDF Concepts]
- Re: RDF-ISSUE-110 (g-box): A proper term for the concept formerly known as “g-box”? [RDF Concepts]
- Re: RDF-ISSUE-110 (g-box): A proper term for the concept formerly known as “g-box”? [RDF Concepts]
- Re: RDF-ISSUE-110 (g-box): A proper term for the concept formerly known as “g-box”? [RDF Concepts]
- Re: RDF-ISSUE-110 (g-box): A proper term for the concept formerly known as “g-box”? [RDF Concepts]
- Re: RDF-ISSUE-110 (g-box): A proper term for the concept formerly known as ?g-box?? [RDF Concepts]
- Re: RDF-ISSUE-110 (g-box): A proper term for the concept formerly known as ?g-box?? [RDF Concepts]
- Re: RDF-ISSUE-110 (g-box): A proper term for the concept formerly known as ?g-box?? [RDF Concepts]
- Re: RDF-ISSUE-110 (g-box): A proper term for the concept formerly known as ?g-box?? [RDF Concepts]
- Re: RDF-ISSUE-110 (g-box): A proper term for the concept formerly known as ?g-box?? [RDF Concepts]
- Re: RDF-ISSUE-110 (g-box): A proper term for the concept formerly known as ?g-box?? [RDF Concepts]
- Re: RDF-ISSUE-110 (g-box): A proper term for the concept formerly known as ?g-box?? [RDF Concepts]
- Re: RDF-ISSUE-110 (g-box): A proper term for the concept formerly known as ?g-box?? [RDF Concepts]
- Re: RDF-ISSUE-110 (g-box): A proper term for the concept formerly known as ?g-box?? [RDF Concepts]
- Re: RDF-ISSUE-110 (g-box): A proper term for the concept formerly known as ?g-box?? [RDF Concepts]
- Re: RDF-ISSUE-110 (g-box): A proper term for the concept formerly known as “g-box”? [RDF Concepts]
- Re: RDF-ISSUE-110 (g-box): A proper term for the concept formerly known as “g-box”? [RDF Concepts]
- Re: RDF-ISSUE-110 (g-box): A proper term for the concept formerly known as “g-box”? [RDF Concepts]
RDF-ISSUE-109 (ill-typed-so-what): What's the consequence of a literal being ill-typed? [RDF Concepts]
Proposal to resolve ISSUE-102 (well-formed lists)
- Re: Proposal to resolve ISSUE-102 (well-formed lists)
- Re: Proposal to resolve ISSUE-102 (well-formed lists)
- Re: Proposal to resolve ISSUE-102 (well-formed lists)
RDF-ISSUE-108 (xsd-valuespaces): Semantics should reference "XML Schema Datatypes in RDF and OWL" [RDF Semantics]
Ill-typed vs. inconsistent?
- Re: Ill-typed vs. inconsistent?
- Re: Ill-typed vs. inconsistent?
- Re: Ill-typed vs. inconsistent?
- Re: Ill-typed vs. inconsistent?
- Factoring of entailment regimes (was: Re: Ill-typed vs. inconsistent?)
- Re: Factoring of entailment regimes (was: Re: Ill-typed vs. inconsistent?)
- Re: Factoring of entailment regimes (was: Re: Ill-typed vs. inconsistent?)
[ALL] Minutes of November 7 2012
Re: RDF-ISSUE-105 (datasets-webarch): Graphs, datasets, authoritative representations, and content negotiation [RDF Concepts]
New abstract for RDF Concepts
RDF-ISSUE-107 (blank-node-definition): Definition of blank nodes (editorial-ish) [RDF Concepts]
RDF-ISSUE-106 (concepts-and-semantics): Relationship between RDF Concepts and RDF Semantics [RDF Concepts]
RDF-ISSUE-105 (datasets-webarch): Graphs, datasets, authoritative representations, and content negotiation [RDF Concepts]
Re: rdf11-concepts WD ready
RDF-ISSUE-104 (concept-notes): Too many informative Notes in RDF Concepts [RDF Concepts]
Disimproved definition of literals in Concepts; close ISSUE-94?
- Re: Disimproved definition of literals in Concepts; close ISSUE-94?
- Re: Disimproved definition of literals in Concepts; close ISSUE-94?
- Re: Disimproved definition of literals in Concepts; close ISSUE-94?
JSON-LD Telecon Minutes for 2012-11-06
Added a Note on XML Schema and OWL2 custom datatypes to Concepts; close ISSUE-96?
- Re: Added a Note on XML Schema and OWL2 custom datatypes to Concepts; close ISSUE-96?
- Re: Added a Note on XML Schema and OWL2 custom datatypes to Concepts; close ISSUE-96?
ISSUE-97: propose to close the issue by doing nothing
ISSUE-84: proposed solution
Re: RDF-ISSUE-103 (dereferenceable-iris): Make dereferenceable IRIs a SHOULD in RDF Concepts [RDF Concepts]
[ALL] agenda telecon 7 Nov
ISSUE-85: Update RDF Semantics to distinguish between the identity of values and the (numeric) equality of values to be in line with XSD 1.1
Some informative edits in the Concepts ED
- Re: Some informative edits in the Concepts ED
- Re: Some informative edits in the Concepts ED
- Re: Some informative edits in the Concepts ED
Agenda: JSON-LD Telecon - Tuesday, November 6th 2012
Re: TriG and default graphs
Turtle Bad IRI syntax tests
RDF-ISSUE-103 (dereferenceable-iris): Make dereferenceable IRIs a SHOULD in RDF Concepts [RDF Concepts]
- Re: RDF-ISSUE-103 (dereferenceable-iris): Make dereferenceable IRIs a SHOULD in RDF Concepts [RDF Concepts]
- Re: RDF-ISSUE-103 (dereferenceable-iris): Make dereferenceable IRIs a SHOULD in RDF Concepts [RDF Concepts]
- Re: RDF-ISSUE-103 (dereferenceable-iris): Make dereferenceable IRIs a SHOULD in RDF Concepts [RDF Concepts]
- Re: RDF-ISSUE-103 (dereferenceable-iris): Make dereferenceable IRIs a SHOULD in RDF Concepts [RDF Concepts]
- Re: RDF-ISSUE-103 (dereferenceable-iris): Make dereferenceable IRIs a SHOULD in RDF Concepts [RDF Concepts]
- RE: RDF-ISSUE-103 (dereferenceable-iris): Make dereferenceable IRIs a SHOULD in RDF Concepts [RDF Concepts]
Re: Moving rdf:Seq and friends to RDF/XML (was: Re: Minutes of RDF-WG F2F, Day 2)
Re: Sloppy inference rules
- RE: Sloppy inference rules
- Re: Sloppy inference rules
- Re: Sloppy inference rules
- Re: Sloppy inference rules
- Re: Sloppy inference rules